include default PR or not (was: [PATCH] barebox: Add recipe for this new bootloader)

[Rolf Leggewie <no2spam@nospam.arcornews.de>]

Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 13:10 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
[...]
>> only way we will get a definitive answer would be to have the TSC hand
>> down a judgement on the matter.
> 
> That would seem sensible if only to lay this matter to rest once and for
> all! It would also be good to test the TSC processes...

I would think this is too minor for the TSC to bother.  But if you want
to take it on, why should I object?  It does take up bandwidth on this
list from time to time, so much is true.  Personally, I don't think the
best option would be to rule in favor of one or the other faction,
because that's what it would be seen for.  I don't think the TSC can
really win and resolve this issue.

*If* the TSC decides to vote on this, may I propose to have it decide
that people are free to include PR as r0 or not as they see fit,
perpetuating current practice. I think that is about the only sensible
solution we can find here.  If anything were to be made definitive, it
should be that devs - when speaking "officially" or something that could
be perceived as such - ought to make sure to stress this is a matter of
(their) personal preference.

Please don't let the TSC turn into some bureaucratic monster that
regulates everything.  When in doubt, feel free to not rule at all.