freshly updated u-boot has malformed patch

freshly updated u-boot has malformed patch

[Robert P. J. Day]

  beagleboard image as usual:

Applying patch u-boot-remove-inline-of-weak-functions.patch
patching file lib_arm/board.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 123.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file lib_arm/board.c
patching file common/main.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 48.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file common/main.c
Patch u-boot-remove-inline-of-weak-functions.patch does not apply
(enforce with -f)
ERROR: Task 151
(/home/rpjday/oe/openembedded/recipes/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb, do_patch)
failed
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 10399 tasks of which 10399 didn't need
to be rerun and 1 failed.
ERROR: '/home/rpjday/oe/openembedded/recipes/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb'
failed

  i'd be more informative but i'm massively sick at the moment.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================

Re: freshly updated u-boot has malformed patch

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
>  beagleboard image as usual:
>
> Applying patch u-boot-remove-inline-of-weak-functions.patch
> patching file lib_arm/board.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 123.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file lib_arm/board.c
> patching file common/main.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 48.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file common/main.c
> Patch u-boot-remove-inline-of-weak-functions.patch does not apply
> (enforce with -f)
> ERROR: Task 151
> (/home/rpjday/oe/openembedded/recipes/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb, do_patch)
> failed
> NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 10399 tasks of which 10399 didn't need
> to be rerun and 1 failed.
> ERROR: '/home/rpjday/oe/openembedded/recipes/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb'
> failed
>
>  i'd be more informative but i'm massively sick at the moment.

which machine ?

Re: freshly updated u-boot has malformed patch

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>>
>>  beagleboard image as usual:

hmm I guess I should have read this line. Seems like beagle is using a
revision which already has
this patch applied. I will fix it.

>>
>> Applying patch u-boot-remove-inline-of-weak-functions.patch
>> patching file lib_arm/board.c
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 123.
>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file lib_arm/board.c
>> patching file common/main.c
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 48.
>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file common/main.c
>> Patch u-boot-remove-inline-of-weak-functions.patch does not apply
>> (enforce with -f)
>> ERROR: Task 151
>> (/home/rpjday/oe/openembedded/recipes/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb, do_patch)
>> failed
>> NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 10399 tasks of which 10399 didn't need
>> to be rerun and 1 failed.
>> ERROR: '/home/rpjday/oe/openembedded/recipes/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb'
>> failed
>>
>>  i'd be more informative but i'm massively sick at the moment.
>
> which machine ?
>

Re: freshly updated u-boot has malformed patch

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11-02-10 00:31, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>  beagleboard image as usual:
> 
> hmm I guess I should have read this line. Seems like beagle is using a
> revision which already has
> this patch applied. I will fix it.

And a lot of other machines I maintain as well, so for the time being
I'm going to revert this patch till someone actually boot tests this on
all affected machines.
I object to this untested patching of bootloaders.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLc7yjMkyGM64RGpERAmJqAJwMllh7QS+rKsxPJTqxleLh2JDDSACeNY7P
H4BfSD/udzhExoEGSGorbeY=
=2Wl9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: freshly updated u-boot has malformed patch

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11-02-10 00:31, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  beagleboard image as usual:
>>
>> hmm I guess I should have read this line. Seems like beagle is using a
>> revision which already has
>> this patch applied. I will fix it.
>
> And a lot of other machines I maintain as well, so for the time being
> I'm going to revert this patch till someone actually boot tests this on
> all affected machines.
> I object to this untested patching of bootloaders.

indeed please go ahead.

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFLc7yjMkyGM64RGpERAmJqAJwMllh7QS+rKsxPJTqxleLh2JDDSACeNY7P
> H4BfSD/udzhExoEGSGorbeY=
> =2Wl9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>