* should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?
@ 2010-07-26 10:57 Robert P. J. Day
2010-07-26 11:30 ` Koen Kooi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2010-07-26 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OpenEmbedded Development mailing list
been trying to keep up with the recent reorg so a quick question --
i was just about to clean and try a rebuild of b-d-i on my 64-bit
ubuntu 10.04 system. should that work?
i ask this since, a few days ago, during a test build, i was
surprised to note that, finally, abiword built but (sadly) firefox was
back to being unbuildable. so i'm never sure what to *expect*. if i
try to build from scratch, should i expect success right now? i'm
going to start the rebuild, anyway.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Top-notch, inexpensive online Linux/OSS/kernel courses
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?
2010-07-26 10:57 should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2010-07-26 11:30 ` Koen Kooi
2010-07-26 11:46 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Koen Kooi @ 2010-07-26 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
It builds fine on all the buildhosts I have (ubuntu 8.04-32bit,
9.10-64bit, debian testing-64bit among others).
And I see no logs attached to your email, so I can't help.
On 26-07-10 12:57, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> been trying to keep up with the recent reorg so a quick question --
> i was just about to clean and try a rebuild of b-d-i on my 64-bit
> ubuntu 10.04 system. should that work?
>
> i ask this since, a few days ago, during a test build, i was
> surprised to note that, finally, abiword built but (sadly) firefox was
> back to being unbuildable. so i'm never sure what to *expect*. if i
> try to build from scratch, should i expect success right now? i'm
> going to start the rebuild, anyway.
>
> rday
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFMTXHoMkyGM64RGpERAqcSAKCgDwqqML5/QpbAwbFtYuotDcGoXACgllxl
rIk5bHacyPx9eU1Sm0S6RXU=
=g076
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?
2010-07-26 11:30 ` Koen Kooi
@ 2010-07-26 11:46 ` Robert P. J. Day
2010-08-01 22:39 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2010-07-26 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It builds fine on all the buildhosts I have (ubuntu 8.04-32bit,
> 9.10-64bit, debian testing-64bit among others).
>
> And I see no logs attached to your email, so I can't help.
come on, koen, that last part was uncalled for. i specifically
stated that i hadn't run the build yet, i just wanted to know if there
were any *known* issues for my 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 platform.
given that you certainly have *legitimate* reasons to criticize some
of my posts here, you don't need to make stuff up.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Top-notch, inexpensive online Linux/OSS/kernel courses
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?
2010-07-26 11:46 ` Robert P. J. Day
@ 2010-08-01 22:39 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-02 14:15 ` Philip Balister
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2010-08-01 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On (26/07/10 07:46), Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > It builds fine on all the buildhosts I have (ubuntu 8.04-32bit,
> > 9.10-64bit, debian testing-64bit among others).
> >
> > And I see no logs attached to your email, so I can't help.
>
> come on, koen, that last part was uncalled for. i specifically
> stated that i hadn't run the build yet, i just wanted to know if there
> were any *known* issues for my 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 platform.
>
> given that you certainly have *legitimate* reasons to criticize some
> of my posts here, you don't need to make stuff up.
You could also check tinderbox.openembedded.org for build results and
it will help you determine the state of stuff you are interested in.
>
> rday
>
> --
>
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
>
> Top-notch, inexpensive online Linux/OSS/kernel courses
> http://crashcourse.ca
>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
> LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
> ========================================================================
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?
2010-08-01 22:39 ` Khem Raj
@ 2010-08-02 14:15 ` Philip Balister
2010-08-03 23:53 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Philip Balister @ 2010-08-02 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On 08/01/2010 06:39 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On (26/07/10 07:46), Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> It builds fine on all the buildhosts I have (ubuntu 8.04-32bit,
>>> 9.10-64bit, debian testing-64bit among others).
>>>
>>> And I see no logs attached to your email, so I can't help.
>>
>> come on, koen, that last part was uncalled for. i specifically
>> stated that i hadn't run the build yet, i just wanted to know if there
>> were any *known* issues for my 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 platform.
>>
>> given that you certainly have *legitimate* reasons to criticize some
>> of my posts here, you don't need to make stuff up.
>
> You could also check tinderbox.openembedded.org for build results and
> it will help you determine the state of stuff you are interested in.
Until the server situation gets sorted out, tinderbox may not be
available at all times.
Philip
>
>>
>> rday
>>
>> --
>>
>> ========================================================================
>> Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
>>
>> Top-notch, inexpensive online Linux/OSS/kernel courses
>> http://crashcourse.ca
>>
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
>> LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
>> ========================================================================
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable?
2010-08-02 14:15 ` Philip Balister
@ 2010-08-03 23:53 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Denys Dmytriyenko @ 2010-08-03 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:15:35AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 08/01/2010 06:39 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On (26/07/10 07:46), Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> It builds fine on all the buildhosts I have (ubuntu 8.04-32bit,
>>>> 9.10-64bit, debian testing-64bit among others).
>>>>
>>>> And I see no logs attached to your email, so I can't help.
>>>
>>> come on, koen, that last part was uncalled for. i specifically
>>> stated that i hadn't run the build yet, i just wanted to know if there
>>> were any *known* issues for my 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 platform.
>>>
>>> given that you certainly have *legitimate* reasons to criticize some
>>> of my posts here, you don't need to make stuff up.
>>
>> You could also check tinderbox.openembedded.org for build results and
>> it will help you determine the state of stuff you are interested in.
>
> Until the server situation gets sorted out, tinderbox may not be available
> at all times.
Plus, tinderbox has been acting up lately, even before the server failure (or
was it actually related?) - in the past month or two there were intermittent
messages about it being unavailable during the build (going up and down all
the time), resulting in unfinished stats...
--
Denys
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-03 23:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-26 10:57 should beagleboard-demo-image (b-d-i) be theoretically buildable? Robert P. J. Day
2010-07-26 11:30 ` Koen Kooi
2010-07-26 11:46 ` Robert P. J. Day
2010-08-01 22:39 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-02 14:15 ` Philip Balister
2010-08-03 23:53 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.