Re: [PATCHv2] kernel/module-base: Append PR to MACHINE_KERNEL_PR

[Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05-04-11 11:32, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:23 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 05-04-11 11:08, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> Thereby making MACHINE_KERNEL_PR mandatory for all machines?
>>
>> I don't see why not.
> 
> The majority of machines aren't using it at present so this would be an
> unexpected (and presumably unwelcome) change for them.  That seems like
> a bad idea unless there is a compelling reason why it needs to be done.

First: You don't get to complain about broken kernel module PRs when you
are against rebuilding them when the kernel changes.

Second: the majority of machines doesn't even build, so those kind of
arguments are bogus

So apart from handwaving ("presumably unwelcome") do you have any actual
arguments against moving all machines to MACHINE_KERNEL_PR?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNmvFnMkyGM64RGpERAqqkAJ4vgIlyQ3cgVAnZS2rcjdGJHjn3uQCfTOjt
UtUZ9dRa9XfWvnganZPrAbg=
=KtE5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----