[meta-efl][V3] epdfview: add initial recipe with version 0.1.8

[meta-efl][V3] epdfview: add initial recipe with version 0.1.8

[Andreas Müller]

initial source taken from oe-classic epdfview_0.1.7.bb
commit 44985d56bc556786812a0a02d6219afd31a7381d

run tested on overo

Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmx.de>
---
 meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdfview_0.1.8.bb |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdfview_0.1.8.bb

diff --git a/meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdfview_0.1.8.bb b/meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdfview_0.1.8.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5351733
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdfview_0.1.8.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "A lightweight PDF viewer based on gtk and poppler"
+HOMEPAGE = "http://www.emma-soft.com/projects/epdfview/"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552"
+SECTION = "x11/applications"
+DEPENDS = "gtk+ poppler"
+
+inherit autotools gettext
+
+SRC_URI = "http://www.emma-soft.com/projects/epdfview/chrome/site/releases/epdfview-${PV}.tar.bz2"
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "e50285b01612169b2594fea375f53ae4"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "948648ae7c9d7b3b408d738bd4f48d87375b1196cae1129d6b846a8de0f2f8f0"
-- 
1.7.6.4

Re: [meta-efl][V3] epdfview: add initial recipe with version 0.1.8

[Khem Raj]

On 10/17/2011 4:50 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
> initial source taken from oe-classic epdfview_0.1.7.bb
> commit 44985d56bc556786812a0a02d6219afd31a7381d
>
> run tested on overo
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller<schnitzeltony@gmx.de>

Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

> ---
>   meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdfview_0.1.8.bb |   12 ++++++++++++
>   1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdfview_0.1.8.bb
>
> diff --git a/meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdfview_0.1.8.bb b/meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdfview_0.1.8.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5351733
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdfview_0.1.8.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +DESCRIPTION = "A lightweight PDF viewer based on gtk and poppler"
> +HOMEPAGE = "http://www.emma-soft.com/projects/epdfview/"
> +LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552"
> +SECTION = "x11/applications"
> +DEPENDS = "gtk+ poppler"
> +
> +inherit autotools gettext
> +
> +SRC_URI = "http://www.emma-soft.com/projects/epdfview/chrome/site/releases/epdfview-${PV}.tar.bz2"
> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "e50285b01612169b2594fea375f53ae4"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "948648ae7c9d7b3b408d738bd4f48d87375b1196cae1129d6b846a8de0f2f8f0"

Re: [meta-efl][V3] epdfview: add initial recipe with version 0.1.8

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 17-10-11 13:50, Andreas Müller schreef:
> initial source taken from oe-classic epdfview_0.1.7.bb commit
> 44985d56bc556786812a0a02d6219afd31a7381d
> 
> run tested on overo
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmx.de>

Martin, do you want to put this in your next pull request or do you want me
to takes this directly?

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFOnVyFMkyGM64RGpERAr1RAKC2lXWrfNhtRyrbB2rCzyIn4df8NACfWzM9
3wn8zFaGfuMnCLyLwxY0YBM=
=Td+/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [meta-efl][V3] epdfview: add initial recipe with version 0.1.8

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 737 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:01:25PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Op 17-10-11 13:50, Andreas Müller schreef:
> > initial source taken from oe-classic epdfview_0.1.7.bb commit
> > 44985d56bc556786812a0a02d6219afd31a7381d
> > 
> > run tested on overo
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmx.de>
> 
> Martin, do you want to put this in your next pull request or do you want me
> to takes this directly?

I have only webkit-efl and eve changes in my queue and I would like to
get them applied upstream first. So please take this directly, I've
tested it here too and it looks fine.

Regards,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: [meta-efl][V3] epdfview: add initial recipe with version 0.1.8

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 18-10-11 13:43, Martin Jansa schreef:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:01:25PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Op 17-10-11 13:50, Andreas Müller schreef:
>>> initial source taken from oe-classic epdfview_0.1.7.bb commit 
>>> 44985d56bc556786812a0a02d6219afd31a7381d
>>> 
>>> run tested on overo
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmx.de>
>> 
>> Martin, do you want to put this in your next pull request or do you
>> want me to takes this directly?
> 
> I have only webkit-efl and eve changes in my queue and I would like to 
> get them applied upstream first. So please take this directly, I've 
> tested it here too and it looks fine.

Done. And patchwork updated itself! THIS IS THE FUTURE!!!!one!!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFOnWkzMkyGM64RGpERAh75AKCC7QMWk7VfHTkZKifhXp1tIll7BwCfVzDq
+j+SEax0kwpolae0rNAnMlM=
=dbcf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

All patches in patchwork archived? Was: [meta-efl][V3] epdfview: add initial recipe with version 0.1.8

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1332 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:55:31PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Op 18-10-11 13:43, Martin Jansa schreef:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:01:25PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> >> 
> >> Op 17-10-11 13:50, Andreas Müller schreef:
> >>> initial source taken from oe-classic epdfview_0.1.7.bb commit 
> >>> 44985d56bc556786812a0a02d6219afd31a7381d
> >>> 
> >>> run tested on overo
> >>> 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmx.de>
> >> 
> >> Martin, do you want to put this in your next pull request or do you
> >> want me to takes this directly?
> > 
> > I have only webkit-efl and eve changes in my queue and I would like to 
> > get them applied upstream first. So please take this directly, I've 
> > tested it here too and it looks fine.
> 
> Done. And patchwork updated itself! THIS IS THE FUTURE!!!!one!!!

Nice, but did it accidentally mark all oe-core patches in 
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe-core/list/
as Archived?

Because such patches are not shown by default even when they are in
state New.

If it's only because of pw upgrade and won't mark them archived after
every push then fine :).

Regards,
-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: All patches in patchwork archived? Was: [meta-efl][V3] epdfview: add initial recipe with version 0.1.8

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 18-10-11 14:20, Martin Jansa schreef:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:55:31PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Op 18-10-11 13:43, Martin Jansa schreef:
>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:01:25PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>>> 
>>>> Op 17-10-11 13:50, Andreas Müller schreef:
>>>>> initial source taken from oe-classic epdfview_0.1.7.bb commit 
>>>>> 44985d56bc556786812a0a02d6219afd31a7381d
>>>>> 
>>>>> run tested on overo
>>>>> 
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmx.de>
>>>> 
>>>> Martin, do you want to put this in your next pull request or do
>>>> you want me to takes this directly?
>>> 
>>> I have only webkit-efl and eve changes in my queue and I would like
>>> to get them applied upstream first. So please take this directly,
>>> I've tested it here too and it looks fine.
>> 
>> Done. And patchwork updated itself! THIS IS THE FUTURE!!!!one!!!
> 
> Nice, but did it accidentally mark all oe-core patches in 
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe-core/list/ as Archived?
> 
> Because such patches are not shown by default even when they are in state
> New.
> 
> If it's only because of pw upgrade and won't mark them archived after 
> every push then fine :).

No, I got tired of the mess and archived them all manually, but left them in
the 'New' state.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFOnXEgMkyGM64RGpERAnX7AJ498OIoWJbYhaue7o3tN5pGnVIE3QCgniup
gw9a/F6rnOekRjtwMjSAeL8=
=BG6n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: All patches in patchwork archived? Was: [meta-efl][V3] epdfview: add initial recipe with version 0.1.8

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1888 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 02:29:21PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Op 18-10-11 14:20, Martin Jansa schreef:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:55:31PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> >> 
> >> Op 18-10-11 13:43, Martin Jansa schreef:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:01:25PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> >>>> 
> >>>> Op 17-10-11 13:50, Andreas Müller schreef:
> >>>>> initial source taken from oe-classic epdfview_0.1.7.bb commit 
> >>>>> 44985d56bc556786812a0a02d6219afd31a7381d
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> run tested on overo
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmx.de>
> >>>> 
> >>>> Martin, do you want to put this in your next pull request or do
> >>>> you want me to takes this directly?
> >>> 
> >>> I have only webkit-efl and eve changes in my queue and I would like
> >>> to get them applied upstream first. So please take this directly,
> >>> I've tested it here too and it looks fine.
> >> 
> >> Done. And patchwork updated itself! THIS IS THE FUTURE!!!!one!!!
> > 
> > Nice, but did it accidentally mark all oe-core patches in 
> > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe-core/list/ as Archived?
> > 
> > Because such patches are not shown by default even when they are in state
> > New.
> > 
> > If it's only because of pw upgrade and won't mark them archived after 
> > every push then fine :).
> 
> No, I got tired of the mess and archived them all manually, but left them in
> the 'New' state.

OK, I've just marked all my oe-core patches appropriately with web
interface..

with meta-oe it will be easier, but I'll learn to use pwclient to mark
them all (except maybe few exceptions) at once :).

Thanks,
-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]