From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] genirq: Rename IRQ_HIDDEN to IRQ_IPI
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:18:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhj5z5sugl7.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124141449.572446-7-maz@kernel.org>
Hi Marc,
On 24/11/20 14:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IRQ_HIDDEN was probably the wrong name, so let's rename it to IRQ_IPI,
> which more accurately describe an IPI with special arch code handling.
>
From the (new) name I would expect this to be set for IRQs requested via
irq_reserve_ipi(), but that wouldn't be correct: MIPs uses that interface,
but doesn't have our arch_show_interrupts() IPI faffery.
With that in mind, perhaps the current name isn't so bad...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] genirq: Rename IRQ_HIDDEN to IRQ_IPI
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:18:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhj5z5sugl7.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124141449.572446-7-maz@kernel.org>
Hi Marc,
On 24/11/20 14:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IRQ_HIDDEN was probably the wrong name, so let's rename it to IRQ_IPI,
> which more accurately describe an IPI with special arch code handling.
>
From the (new) name I would expect this to be set for IRQs requested via
irq_reserve_ipi(), but that wouldn't be correct: MIPs uses that interface,
but doesn't have our arch_show_interrupts() IPI faffery.
With that in mind, perhaps the current name isn't so bad...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-26 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 14:14 [PATCH v2 0/6] arm/arm64: Allow the rescheduling IPI to bypass irq_enter/exit Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] genirq: Add __irq_modify_status() helper to clear/set special flags Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] genirq: Allow an interrupt to be marked as 'raw' Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 16:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 16:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 18:18 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-11-26 18:18 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-03 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-03 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-03 15:52 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-03 15:52 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-05 19:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-05 19:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-10 15:07 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-10 15:07 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:28 ` Todd Kjos
2021-06-23 17:28 ` Todd Kjos
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: Mark the recheduling IPI as raw interrupt Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:15 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-10 15:15 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm: " Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] genirq: Drop IRQ_HIDDEN from IRQF_MODIFY_MASK Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] genirq: Rename IRQ_HIDDEN to IRQ_IPI Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 18:18 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-11-26 18:18 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-01 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] arm/arm64: Allow the rescheduling IPI to bypass irq_enter/exit ito-yuichi
2021-03-01 0:39 ` ito-yuichi
2021-03-01 9:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-01 9:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-09 6:20 ` Yuichi Ito
2021-03-09 6:20 ` Yuichi Ito
2021-06-18 19:30 ` Abhijeet Dharmapurikar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jhj5z5sugl7.mognet@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.