All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: Sanity check host processor physical address width
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:25:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpglhep6smm.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150709145105.1c533e4c@nial.brq.redhat.com> (Igor Mammedov's message of "Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:51:05 +0200")

Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:42:01 -0400
> Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> 
>> If a Linux guest is assigned more memory than is supported
>> by the host processor, the guest is unable to boot. That
>> is expected, however, there's no message indicating the user
>> what went wrong. This change prints a message to stderr if
>> KVM has the corresponding capability.
>> 
>> Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
>>  target-i386/kvm.c         | 6 ++++++
>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> index 3bac873..6afad49 100644
>> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -817,6 +817,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
>>  #define KVM_CAP_DISABLE_QUIRKS 116
>>  #define KVM_CAP_X86_SMM 117
>>  #define KVM_CAP_MULTI_ADDRESS_SPACE 118
>> +#define KVM_CAP_PHY_ADDR_WIDTH 119
>>  
>>  #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>>  
>> diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
>> index 066d03d..66e3448 100644
>> --- a/target-i386/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
>> @@ -892,6 +892,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>>      uint64_t shadow_mem;
>>      int ret;
>>      struct utsname utsname;
>> +    int max_phys_bits;
>>  
>>      ret = kvm_get_supported_msrs(s);
>>      if (ret < 0) {
>> @@ -945,6 +946,11 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>>          }
>>      }
>>  
>> +    max_phys_bits = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PHY_ADDR_WIDTH);
> max_phys_bits seems generic enough and could be applied to other targets
> as well.

I am a little clueless about other targets but is figuring this out from userspace
as simple as it's on x86 (cpuid)? If not, then I agree, this could be made a generic
value.

Bandan

> making it a property of machine, would make accessing/manipulating it easier.
> define default value for machine/TCG mode and when KVM is enabled
> it would override/set its own limit.
>
> then any board could easily access machine->max_gpa to make board specific
> checks.
>
>> +    if (max_phys_bits && (1ULL << max_phys_bits) <= ram_size)
>> +        fprintf(stderr, "Warning: The amount of memory assigned to the guest "
>> +            "is more than that supported by the host CPU(s). Guest may be unstable.\n");
>> +
>>      if (kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_X86_SMM)) {
>>          smram_machine_done.notify = register_smram_listener;
>>          qemu_add_machine_init_done_notifier(&smram_machine_done);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: Sanity check host processor physical address width
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:25:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpglhep6smm.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150709145105.1c533e4c@nial.brq.redhat.com> (Igor Mammedov's message of "Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:51:05 +0200")

Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:42:01 -0400
> Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> 
>> If a Linux guest is assigned more memory than is supported
>> by the host processor, the guest is unable to boot. That
>> is expected, however, there's no message indicating the user
>> what went wrong. This change prints a message to stderr if
>> KVM has the corresponding capability.
>> 
>> Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
>>  target-i386/kvm.c         | 6 ++++++
>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> index 3bac873..6afad49 100644
>> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -817,6 +817,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
>>  #define KVM_CAP_DISABLE_QUIRKS 116
>>  #define KVM_CAP_X86_SMM 117
>>  #define KVM_CAP_MULTI_ADDRESS_SPACE 118
>> +#define KVM_CAP_PHY_ADDR_WIDTH 119
>>  
>>  #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>>  
>> diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
>> index 066d03d..66e3448 100644
>> --- a/target-i386/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
>> @@ -892,6 +892,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>>      uint64_t shadow_mem;
>>      int ret;
>>      struct utsname utsname;
>> +    int max_phys_bits;
>>  
>>      ret = kvm_get_supported_msrs(s);
>>      if (ret < 0) {
>> @@ -945,6 +946,11 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>>          }
>>      }
>>  
>> +    max_phys_bits = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PHY_ADDR_WIDTH);
> max_phys_bits seems generic enough and could be applied to other targets
> as well.

I am a little clueless about other targets but is figuring this out from userspace
as simple as it's on x86 (cpuid)? If not, then I agree, this could be made a generic
value.

Bandan

> making it a property of machine, would make accessing/manipulating it easier.
> define default value for machine/TCG mode and when KVM is enabled
> it would override/set its own limit.
>
> then any board could easily access machine->max_gpa to make board specific
> checks.
>
>> +    if (max_phys_bits && (1ULL << max_phys_bits) <= ram_size)
>> +        fprintf(stderr, "Warning: The amount of memory assigned to the guest "
>> +            "is more than that supported by the host CPU(s). Guest may be unstable.\n");
>> +
>>      if (kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_X86_SMM)) {
>>          smram_machine_done.notify = register_smram_listener;
>>          qemu_add_machine_init_done_notifier(&smram_machine_done);

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 22:42 [PATCH] target-i386: Sanity check host processor physical address width Bandan Das
2015-07-08 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Bandan Das
2015-07-09  7:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09  7:02   ` [Qemu-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09  9:27   ` Igor Mammedov
2015-07-09  9:27     ` Igor Mammedov
2015-07-09 10:03     ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09 10:03       ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09 19:11       ` Bandan Das
2015-07-09 19:11         ` Bandan Das
2015-07-09 19:30         ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09 19:30           ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09  7:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-09  7:59   ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-09  8:26   ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09  8:26     ` [Qemu-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09 13:04     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-09 13:04       ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-09 19:22       ` Bandan Das
2015-07-09 19:22         ` [Qemu-devel] " Bandan Das
2015-07-09 12:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2015-07-09 12:51   ` Igor Mammedov
2015-07-09 19:25   ` Bandan Das [this message]
2015-07-09 19:25     ` Bandan Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jpglhep6smm.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy \
    --to=bsd@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.