* advice for testing fileserver
@ 2012-09-11 17:19 Caleb O'Connell
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Caleb O'Connell @ 2012-09-11 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
I'm building a test file server using samba 3.6 to see if BTRFS is a good
fit. I want to stress that this is a test setup for now.
I'm trying to get an idea of the sub-volume concept and how it relates to
the LVM concept. Trying to see what might be the best practice.
I was going to create one of two configs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
##
option 1
sda1 -> /boot using ext4
sda2 is LV sysvg, this will include:
lvroot -> / using ext4
lvvar -> /var using ext4
lvopt -> /opt using ext4
lvhome -> /home using btrfs
lvsrv -> /srv using btrfs
I could create sub-volumes in srv for each samba share.
##
option 2
sda1 -> /boot using ext4
sda2 is LV sysvg, this will include:
lvroot -> / using ext4
lvvar -> /var using ext4
lvopt -> /opt using ext4
sda3 -> /home using btrfs
sda4 -> /srv using btrfs
both /home and /srv can create their own sub-volumes for each homedir and
each share.
____________________________________________________________________________
Does BTRFS work fine within a LV? Is there an advantage to keep BTRDS out
or in a LV? Does all this make no sense? and I really should just create
one big BTRFS partition and only use sub-volumes?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-09-11 17:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-11 17:19 advice for testing fileserver Caleb O'Connell
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.