From: Sergio Callegari <sergio.callegari@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: disallowing push to currently checked-out branch
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:06:37 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20090216T095523-830@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090216000220.GA3503@coredump.intra.peff.net
In my workflows (and let me remark it, in mine, which might well be mine only or
even very stupid), what would be nice would be the possibility of triggering the
following scenario:
- When you push to a repo which is not bare, if you push to a checked out
branch, the branch gets updated, the worktree is not touched, the head becomes
detached, the branch the head was on gets saved somewhere, and when someone
tries asking for status or committing on the repo he gets a message like:
"The branch has been changed behind your shoulders from remote. Your work tree
changes are anyway safe. Head has been detached, your former branch was .... You
can either:
- start a new branch with the changes that are currently in your worktree with
command so and so...
- stash the current status, peek at the new head of your former branch, try
applying your current changes there."
Also it would be nice to be able to store my "standard initial setup" in
.gitinit or something like this, so that whenever I git init I have my own
defaults (which is not the same as having global config info).
...thanks for pre-announcing incompatible changes.
Sergio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-16 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-15 21:31 [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 21:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 22:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-15 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 23:20 ` Heikki Orsila
2009-02-16 0:04 ` disallowing push to currently checked-out branch Jeff King
2009-02-16 1:33 ` david
2009-02-16 1:47 ` david
2009-02-16 1:30 ` Julian Phillips
2009-02-16 4:01 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 8:33 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-02-16 8:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 10:17 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 13:58 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 17:13 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 17:33 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-02-16 17:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 18:48 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 20:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 21:12 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 21:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 22:28 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 22:52 ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 5:53 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 11:28 ` PUSH_HEAD, was " Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 17:29 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 19:48 ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 22:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 22:42 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 22:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 19:24 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 20:09 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 21:42 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 0:07 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-17 0:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 0:41 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-17 0:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 1:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 0:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 21:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 22:43 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 23:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 0:23 ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 0:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 1:29 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 3:50 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 5:05 ` david
2009-02-16 4:05 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 5:18 ` david
2009-02-16 4:37 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 5:55 ` david
2009-02-16 5:06 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 10:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 10:50 ` dashed commands, was " Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:53 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible david
2009-02-15 23:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 0:14 ` david
2009-02-15 23:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 0:38 ` david
2009-02-16 0:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 10:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 15:33 ` david
2009-02-16 14:40 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-02-16 0:02 ` disallowing push to currently checked-out branch Jeff King
2009-02-16 10:06 ` Sergio Callegari [this message]
2009-02-15 23:01 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Jakub Narebski
2009-02-15 23:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:38 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-16 0:35 ` david
2009-02-16 0:07 ` send-email sending shallow threads by default Jeff King
2009-02-16 0:09 ` Pieter de Bie
2009-02-16 2:43 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 2:55 ` Brian Gernhardt
2009-02-16 9:56 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2009-02-16 7:55 ` SZEDER Gábor
2009-02-16 10:38 ` Martin Mares
2009-02-17 8:34 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-02-17 9:06 ` Martin Mares
2009-02-17 19:28 ` Jeff King
2009-02-20 3:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20 3:26 ` Jeff King
2009-02-20 4:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-17 8:30 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-02-16 1:27 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Sitaram Chamarty
2009-02-16 8:04 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-02-16 8:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 9:07 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-02-16 2:42 ` [RFC - draft #2] " Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 3:20 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 21:10 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20090216T095523-830@post.gmane.org \
--to=sergio.callegari@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.