All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: nigel@nrg.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 06:11:39 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m14j5FD-001PKFC@mozart> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:26:44 PST." <Pine.LNX.4.05.10103291555390.8122-100000@cosmic.nrg.org>

In message <Pine.LNX.4.05.10103291555390.8122-100000@cosmic.nrg.org> you write:
> Here is an attempt at a possible version of synchronize_kernel() that
> should work on a preemptible kernel.  I haven't tested it yet.

It's close, but...

Those who suggest that we don't do preemtion on SMP make this much
easier (synchronize_kernel() is a NOP on UP), and I'm starting to
agree with them.  Anyway:

> 		if (p->state == TASK_RUNNING ||
> 				(p->state == (TASK_RUNNING|TASK_PREEMPTED))) {
> 			p->flags |= PF_SYNCING;

Setting a running task's flags brings races, AFAICT, and checking
p->state is NOT sufficient, consider wait_event(): you need p->has_cpu
here I think.  You could do it for TASK_PREEMPTED only, but you'd have
to do the "unreal priority" part of synchronize_kernel() with some
method to say "don't preempt anyone", but it will hurt latency.
Hmmm...

The only way I can see is to have a new element in "struct
task_struct" saying "syncing now", which is protected by the runqueue
lock.  This looks like (and I prefer wait queues, they have such nice
helpers):

	static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(syncing_task);
	static DECLARE_MUTEX(synchronize_kernel_mtx);
	static int sync_count = 0;

schedule():
	if (!(prev->state & TASK_PREEMPTED) && prev->syncing)
		if (--sync_count == 0) wake_up(&syncing_task);

synchronize_kernel():
{
	struct list_head *tmp;
	struct task_struct *p;

	/* Guard against multiple calls to this function */
	down(&synchronize_kernel_mtx);

	/* Everyone running now or currently preempted must
	   voluntarily schedule before we know we are safe. */
	spin_lock_irq(&runqueue_lock);
	list_for_each(tmp, &runqueue_head) {
		p = list_entry(tmp, struct task_struct, run_list);
		if (p->has_cpu || p->state == (TASK_RUNNING|TASK_PREEMPTED)) {
			p->syncing = 1;
			sync_count++;
		}
	}
	spin_unlock_irq(&runqueue_lock);

	/* Wait for them all */
	wait_event(syncing_task, sync_count == 0);
	up(&synchronize_kernel_mtx);
}

Also untested 8),
Rusty.
--
Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK

  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-30 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-15  1:25 [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel Nigel Gamble
2001-03-17 17:34 ` Pavel Machek
2001-03-19 21:01   ` Nigel Gamble
2001-03-20  8:43 ` Rusty Russell
2001-03-20  9:32   ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21  0:48     ` Nigel Gamble
2001-03-21  1:23       ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21  3:35         ` Nigel Gamble
2001-03-21  8:04           ` george anzinger
2001-03-21  9:04             ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21 14:32             ` Rusty Russell
2001-03-23 20:42               ` Nigel Gamble
2001-03-28 11:47             ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-03-21  9:19           ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21  9:41             ` David S. Miller
2001-03-21 10:05               ` Andrew Morton
2001-03-22  0:20                 ` Nigel Gamble
2001-03-21 10:57               ` george anzinger
2001-03-21 11:30                 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-21 17:07                   ` george anzinger
2001-03-21 18:18               ` Nigel Gamble
2001-03-21 22:25               ` Rusty Russell
2001-03-21 15:46             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-28 10:20           ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-03-28 20:51             ` george anzinger
2001-03-29  9:43               ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-03-30  6:32               ` Keith Owens
2001-03-21  0:24   ` Nigel Gamble
2001-03-30  0:26     ` Nigel Gamble
2001-03-30 20:11       ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2001-04-01  7:48         ` george anzinger
2001-04-01 21:13           ` Nigel Gamble
2001-04-02 19:56             ` george anzinger
2001-04-04 17:59               ` Rusty Russell
2001-04-01 21:07         ` Nigel Gamble
2001-04-04 17:51           ` Rusty Russell
2001-03-20 18:25 ` Roger Larsson
2001-03-20 22:06   ` Nigel Gamble
2001-03-20 22:27     ` george anzinger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-06 23:52 Paul McKenney
2001-04-07  0:45 ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-07  1:25 Paul McKenney
2001-04-07 19:59 ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m14j5FD-001PKFC@mozart \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigel@nrg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.