From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm7
Date: 20 May 2003 14:01:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1fzn91j63.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535806509.1053435150@IBM-O1F8DZ9MWMH>
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> writes:
> Seems that -mm7, has broken compilation of subarch visws:
>
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `cpu_stop_apics':
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0xe511): undefined reference to
> `stop_this_cpu'
>
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `stop_apics':
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0xe552): undefined reference to `reboot_cpu'
> arch/i386/mach-visws/built-in.o: In function `machine_restart':
> arch/i386/mach-visws/built-in.o(.text+0x1): undefined reference to
> `smp_send_stop'
>
> Seems that the culprit is the reboot on boot processor changes, reverting the
> following patches fixes the compilation:
>
> patch -R -p1 <kexec-revert-NORET_TYPE.patch
> patch -R -p1 <reboot_on_bsp.patch
>
> Cheers.
Do you have a machine to test against. Or is this a test for completeness?
I don't get the subarch factoring. And as such I cannot see how to
properly fixup the subarch code.
Eric
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm7
Date: 20 May 2003 14:01:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1fzn91j63.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535806509.1053435150@IBM-O1F8DZ9MWMH>
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> writes:
> Seems that -mm7, has broken compilation of subarch visws:
>
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `cpu_stop_apics':
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0xe511): undefined reference to
> `stop_this_cpu'
>
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `stop_apics':
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0xe552): undefined reference to `reboot_cpu'
> arch/i386/mach-visws/built-in.o: In function `machine_restart':
> arch/i386/mach-visws/built-in.o(.text+0x1): undefined reference to
> `smp_send_stop'
>
> Seems that the culprit is the reboot on boot processor changes, reverting the
> following patches fixes the compilation:
>
> patch -R -p1 <kexec-revert-NORET_TYPE.patch
> patch -R -p1 <reboot_on_bsp.patch
>
> Cheers.
Do you have a machine to test against. Or is this a test for completeness?
I don't get the subarch factoring. And as such I cannot see how to
properly fixup the subarch code.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-20 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-19 8:23 2.5.69-mm7 Andrew Morton
2003-05-19 8:23 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Andrew Morton
2003-05-19 10:30 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Rudmer van Dijk
2003-05-19 10:30 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Rudmer van Dijk
2003-05-19 10:38 ` 2.5.69-mm7 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-19 10:38 ` 2.5.69-mm7 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-19 13:19 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Rudmer van Dijk
2003-05-19 13:19 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Rudmer van Dijk
2003-05-19 10:58 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-05-19 10:58 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-05-20 19:52 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Andy Whitcroft
2003-05-20 19:52 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Andy Whitcroft
2003-05-20 20:01 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2003-05-20 20:01 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-21 12:13 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Ivan Kokshaysky
2003-05-21 12:13 ` 2.5.69-mm7 Ivan Kokshaysky
2003-05-22 3:33 ` 2.5.69-mm7 build problem in sound/oss/cs46xx.c Kevin Puetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1fzn91j63.fsf@frodo.biederman.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.