diff for duplicates of <m1r5xitpdh.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index ceefd58..5cc58a4 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes: +Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> writes: > On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 13:46 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: ->> Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes: +>> Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> writes: >> >> > This makes wireless extensions netns aware. >> > ->> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> +>> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> >> > --- >> > Is this ok, or is this racy? I guess what I'm asking is -- will >> > for_each_net() stop iterating over a netns that is going away before the @@ -21,3 +21,7 @@ I'm not using rcu safe list manipulation. What makes it look like rcu_read_lock() is safe? Eric +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in +the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index b52e1bb..2644eee 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,25 +1,26 @@ "ref\01245263058.31588.38.camel@johannes.local\0" "ref\0m1y6rqwpur.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org\0" "ref\01245276899.31588.57.camel@johannes.local\0" - "From\0ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)\0" + "ref\01245276899.31588.57.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org\0" + "From\0ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] wireless extensions: play with netns\0" "Date\0Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:24:58 -0700\0" - "To\0Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>\0" - "Cc\0John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>" - Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org> - linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> - Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@aristanetworks.com> - " Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>\0" + "To\0Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>\0" + "Cc\0John Linville <linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>" + Netdev <netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> + linux-wireless <linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> + Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-BGArkANP9klv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> + " Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:\n" + "Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> writes:\n" "\n" "> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 13:46 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:\n" - ">> Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:\n" + ">> Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> writes:\n" ">> \n" ">> > This makes wireless extensions netns aware.\n" ">> >\n" - ">> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>\n" + ">> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>\n" ">> > ---\n" ">> > Is this ok, or is this racy? I guess what I'm asking is -- will\n" ">> > for_each_net() stop iterating over a netns that is going away before the\n" @@ -34,6 +35,10 @@ "I'm not using rcu safe list manipulation. What makes it look like\n" "rcu_read_lock() is safe?\n" "\n" - Eric + "Eric\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-wireless\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -91a4d1119d98440a3d27f02206db39f72f22b4432737ca38a4080bc15deeaffb +23f306fabe36830d9e7cec867c19715119972e2b02c911e1bb7edcc461f3ba19
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.