From: Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM and *bad* performance (no striping)
Date: 27 May 2001 11:47:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m27kz39l8t.fsf@isnogud.escape.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200105270747.f4R7lIYa005098@webber.adilger.int>; from Andreas Dilger on Sun, 27 May 2001 01:47:18 -0600 (MDT)
Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com> writes:
> /dev/vgtest/lvtest = real 66.909s user 0.440s sys 10.420 *** 5x as slow
> /dev/vgtest/lvtest = real 70.135s user 0.520s sys 11.390 *** 5x as slow
>
> /dev/vgtest3/lvtest = real 63.552s user 0.510s sys 10.290s *** 6x as slow
> /dev/vgtest3/lvtest = real 62.354s user 0.610s sys 10.020s *** 6x as slow
This is similar to the worst case numbers I have measured.
> I'm not sure if it is an SMP or SCSI issue, or what. Urs, do you also
> have an SMP system? Maybe there are locking slowdowns under SMP and
> not under UP?
No. It's a single Pentium II, 333MHz, kernel 2.4.3 with lvm-0.9.1_beta7
compiled without SMP support:
isnogud:urs$ grep SMP /usr/src/linux-2.4.3-ut/.config
# CONFIG_SMP is not set
The SCSI controller is an Adaptec AIC 7880 on an ASUS P2L97-S
mainboard (onboard). The SCSI disks are
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: DCAS-34330W Rev: S65A
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: DCAS-34330W Rev: S65A
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00
Vendor: NEC Model: DSE2100S Rev: 0306
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
i.e. /dev/sda and /dev/sdb are UW-SCSI and /dev/sdc is a SCSI-2 disks.
> The problem is definitely more noticable on the SCSI disks, but at least
> on the IDE disk the increased wall-clock time is wholly accounted for
> by increased system time. On the SCSI disks, it would guess that "dd"
> is waiting for I/O completions under LVM, and not on the raw disk???
How could I check? And do you have an idea, why a file system on top
of such a slow LV is, if at all, only somewhat slower?
urs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-27 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-26 15:44 [linux-lvm] LVM and *bad* performance (no striping) Urs Thuermann
2001-02-26 20:39 ` Joe Thornber
2001-02-26 21:03 ` Jorg de Jong
2001-02-26 21:38 ` Rik van Riel
2001-02-27 8:35 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-02-27 12:21 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-02-28 11:05 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-10 19:30 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-04-10 21:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-11 11:23 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-04-11 19:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-11 22:00 ` Terje Kvernes
2001-05-15 11:46 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-05-15 12:13 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-05-26 11:17 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-05-27 7:47 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-27 9:47 ` Urs Thuermann [this message]
2001-05-27 17:01 ` [linux-lvm] LVM and *bad* performance (counterexample) idsfa
2001-05-15 17:08 ` [linux-lvm] LVM and *bad* performance (no striping) Andreas Dilger
2001-05-26 11:23 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-02-26 21:41 ` Rik van Riel
2001-02-27 10:33 ` Urs Thuermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m27kz39l8t.fsf@isnogud.escape.de \
--to=urs@isnogud.escape.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.