From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add device tree probe for sdhci-esdhc-imx
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:14:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2pqljje3w.fsf@bob.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309970870-13336-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> (Shawn Guo's message of "Thu, 7 Jul 2011 00:47:46 +0800")
Hi Shawn,
On Wed, Jul 06 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The first patch copies platform data into driver private data, and
> do not reference platform data after probe. The second one removes
> the uses of cpu_is_mx(). The third one makes a dt related fix on
> sdhci-pltfm.c, and the last one adds actual device tree probe for
> sdhci-esdhc-imx driver.
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Add patch #1
> * Do not use Linux details of cd-type and wp-type for binding
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Address review comments given by Grant
>
> Shawn Guo (4):
> mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: do not reference platform data after probe
> mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx()
> mmc: sdhci-pltfm: dt device does not pass parent to sdhci_alloc_host
> mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add device tree probe support
These don't apply against mmc-next -- what is your tree based on?
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add device tree probe for sdhci-esdhc-imx
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:14:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2pqljje3w.fsf@bob.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309970870-13336-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> (Shawn Guo's message of "Thu, 7 Jul 2011 00:47:46 +0800")
Hi Shawn,
On Wed, Jul 06 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The first patch copies platform data into driver private data, and
> do not reference platform data after probe. The second one removes
> the uses of cpu_is_mx(). The third one makes a dt related fix on
> sdhci-pltfm.c, and the last one adds actual device tree probe for
> sdhci-esdhc-imx driver.
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Add patch #1
> * Do not use Linux details of cd-type and wp-type for binding
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Address review comments given by Grant
>
> Shawn Guo (4):
> mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: do not reference platform data after probe
> mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx()
> mmc: sdhci-pltfm: dt device does not pass parent to sdhci_alloc_host
> mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add device tree probe support
These don't apply against mmc-next -- what is your tree based on?
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-09 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-06 16:47 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add device tree probe for sdhci-esdhc-imx Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 16:47 ` Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 16:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: do not reference platform data after probe Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 16:47 ` Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 21:03 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-06 21:03 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-06 16:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 16:47 ` Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 16:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mmc: sdhci-pltfm: dt device does not pass parent to sdhci_alloc_host Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 16:47 ` Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 16:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add device tree probe support Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 16:47 ` Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 21:05 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-06 21:05 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-13 15:52 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-07-13 15:52 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-07-13 16:09 ` Scott Wood
2011-07-13 16:09 ` Scott Wood
2011-07-13 16:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-07-13 16:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-07-13 16:36 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-13 16:36 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-13 17:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-07-13 17:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-07-09 22:14 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2011-07-09 22:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Add device tree probe for sdhci-esdhc-imx Chris Ball
2011-07-10 1:37 ` Shawn Guo
2011-07-10 1:37 ` Shawn Guo
2011-07-19 1:51 ` Chris Ball
2011-07-19 1:51 ` Chris Ball
2011-07-19 8:10 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-07-19 8:10 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-07-19 8:59 ` Shawn Guo
2011-07-19 8:59 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2pqljje3w.fsf@bob.laptop.org \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.