All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	"x86\@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	tee@sgi.com, Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: avoid atomic operation in test_and_set_bit_lock if possible
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:40:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2sjucl0a6.fsf@firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110324200010.GB7957@elte.hu> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:00:10 +0100")

Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
>
> One good way to see cache bounces is to run a misses/accesses ratio profile:
>
>    perf top -e cache-misses -e cache-references --count-filter 10
>
> Note the two events: this runs a 'weighted' profile, you'll see (LLC) 
> cache-misses of a function relative to cache-references it does, a 
> misses/references ratio in essence.

If anyone does this on a Nehalem please only use 2.6.39-rc*+ which
includes the offcore patches. Anything before that will get you complete
bogus numbers.

BTW with Lin-Ming's memory latency profiling code you can do this much
more directly.

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-24 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-24  4:56 [PATCH RFC] x86: avoid atomic operation in test_and_set_bit_lock if possible Nikanth Karthikesan
2011-03-24  8:52 ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-24  8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 14:52   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-03-24 16:48     ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-24 17:19       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-25 10:06         ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-25 11:10           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-25 12:04             ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2011-03-25 13:12           ` Jack Steiner
2011-03-25 16:29           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-25 16:47             ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-25 16:49             ` Jack Steiner
2011-03-24 17:30       ` Jack Steiner
2011-03-24 20:00         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 20:40           ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2011-03-24 20:50             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 21:37               ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-24 20:48           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-24 20:54             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 21:02               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-24 21:42                 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-24 23:26                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-24 23:56                     ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-25  5:47                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-25  9:32                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-25  9:44                           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-25  9:59                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-25 10:50                               ` Borislav Petkov
2011-03-25 11:10                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-25 11:11                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-25 16:16                           ` Robert Richter
2011-03-25 17:22                           ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-25 19:26                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-25  9:38                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-25 20:29                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-26  8:15                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-26  9:44                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-26  9:57                               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-25  9:22                       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-25 10:21                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-25 16:08                           ` Robert Richter
2011-03-25 19:31                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-25 17:15                           ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-25 19:21                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-25  9:35                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-24 17:13 ` Jack Steiner
2011-03-24 18:38 ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2sjucl0a6.fsf@firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=knikanth@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tee@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.