Re: windfarm_fcu_controls: cpu-pump-0 <HW FAULT>

[Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>]

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> writes:

> Can you add some more printk's in there to check what's going on inside
> wf_fcu_get_pump_minmax() ?

All values from mpu->processor_part_num are 0xffff.

> Also is it getting faults for both pumps ?

Yes.

> Does it work with the older driver ? (both the minmax and the reading of
> the pump).

The minmax situation is the same, but otherwise appears to work (no fan
reading errors logged).  Here is an example debug output:

** CPU 1 RPM: 300 Ex, 300, Pump: 1250, In, overtemp: 0
  cpu 0, exhaust RPM: 300
  cpu 0, temp raw: 023c, m_diode: 9982, b_diode: fffff799
  temp: 52.139
  cpu 0, current: 8.789, voltage: 1.286, power: 11.308 W
  cpu 1, exhaust RPM: 300
  cpu 1, temp raw: 021c, m_diode: a047, b_diode: fffff777
  temp: 50.380
  cpu 1, current: 8.666, voltage: 1.281, power: 11.108 W
  power target: 55.000, error: 43.691
  integral: 00f42f8d
   integ_p: 10
   adj_in_target: 65.011, ttarget: 74
   deriv_p: -15
   prop_p: -103
   sum: -118

> What is the "failures" bitmask value ?

3 for both.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."