All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: light: fix a couple double frees
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:53:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m35zmgvx9b.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190829122839.GA20116@mwanda>

Hi Dan,
On Thu 29 Aug 2019 at 13:28, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The problem is in gb_lights_request_handler().  If we get a request to
> change the config then we release the light with gb_lights_light_release()
> and re-allocated it.  However, if the allocation fails part way through
> then we call gb_lights_light_release() again.  This can lead to a couple
> different double frees where we haven't cleared out the original values:
>
> 	gb_lights_light_v4l2_unregister(light);
> 	...
> 	kfree(light->channels);
> 	kfree(light->name);
>
> I also made a small change to how we set "light->channels_count = 0;".
> The original code handled this part fine and did not cause a use after
> free but it was sort of complicated to read.
>
> Fixes: 2870b52bae4c ("greybus: lights: add lights implementation")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>

Thanks so much for this, I was looking for some time at this and
was half way to a much less elegant fix then yours.

Acked-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>

Cheers,
    Rui

> ---
>  drivers/staging/greybus/light.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> index 010ae1e9c7fb..40680eaf3974 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> @@ -1098,21 +1098,21 @@ static void gb_lights_channel_release(struct gb_channel *channel)
>  static void gb_lights_light_release(struct gb_light *light)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -	int count;
>
>  	light->ready = false;
>
> -	count = light->channels_count;
> -
>  	if (light->has_flash)
>  		gb_lights_light_v4l2_unregister(light);
> +	light->has_flash = false;
>
> -	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < light->channels_count; i++)
>  		gb_lights_channel_release(&light->channels[i]);
> -		light->channels_count--;
> -	}
> +	light->channels_count = 0;
> +
>  	kfree(light->channels);
> +	light->channels = NULL;
>  	kfree(light->name);
> +	light->name = NULL;
>  }
>
>  static void gb_lights_release(struct gb_lights *glights)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: light: fix a couple double frees
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:53:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m35zmgvx9b.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190829122839.GA20116@mwanda>

Hi Dan,
On Thu 29 Aug 2019 at 13:28, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The problem is in gb_lights_request_handler().  If we get a request to
> change the config then we release the light with gb_lights_light_release()
> and re-allocated it.  However, if the allocation fails part way through
> then we call gb_lights_light_release() again.  This can lead to a couple
> different double frees where we haven't cleared out the original values:
>
> 	gb_lights_light_v4l2_unregister(light);
> 	...
> 	kfree(light->channels);
> 	kfree(light->name);
>
> I also made a small change to how we set "light->channels_count = 0;".
> The original code handled this part fine and did not cause a use after
> free but it was sort of complicated to read.
>
> Fixes: 2870b52bae4c ("greybus: lights: add lights implementation")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>

Thanks so much for this, I was looking for some time at this and
was half way to a much less elegant fix then yours.

Acked-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>

Cheers,
    Rui

> ---
>  drivers/staging/greybus/light.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> index 010ae1e9c7fb..40680eaf3974 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> @@ -1098,21 +1098,21 @@ static void gb_lights_channel_release(struct gb_channel *channel)
>  static void gb_lights_light_release(struct gb_light *light)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -	int count;
>
>  	light->ready = false;
>
> -	count = light->channels_count;
> -
>  	if (light->has_flash)
>  		gb_lights_light_v4l2_unregister(light);
> +	light->has_flash = false;
>
> -	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < light->channels_count; i++)
>  		gb_lights_channel_release(&light->channels[i]);
> -		light->channels_count--;
> -	}
> +	light->channels_count = 0;
> +
>  	kfree(light->channels);
> +	light->channels = NULL;
>  	kfree(light->name);
> +	light->name = NULL;
>  }
>
>  static void gb_lights_release(struct gb_lights *glights)


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-29 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-29 12:28 [PATCH] staging: greybus: light: fix a couple double frees Dan Carpenter
2019-08-29 12:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-08-29 14:53 ` Rui Miguel Silva [this message]
2019-08-29 14:53   ` Rui Miguel Silva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m35zmgvx9b.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=rmfrfs@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.