* incompatable pointer type warnings on some archs
@ 2002-12-11 5:48 James H. Cloos Jr.
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: James H. Cloos Jr. @ 2002-12-11 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I see that find_next_zero_bit() has a first arg of void* in about half
of the archs and unsigned long* in the rest (incl asm-i386/bitops.h).
Looking at incompatable pointer type warnings in a recent compile, I
found one where the caller was passing a u64*, thus the error.
Should all of the archs use a void* for this, or is there some reason
not to?
test_and_set_bit() and test_and_clear_bit() also have the same issue.
-JimC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-12-11 5:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-11 5:48 incompatable pointer type warnings on some archs James H. Cloos Jr.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.