* [PATCH] mmc: fix CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME regression
@ 2011-03-08 21:32 Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-03-08 21:56 ` Chris Ball
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen @ 2011-03-08 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mmc
Cc: Chris Ball, Dmitry Shmidt, Maxim Levitsky, Ohad Ben-Cohen, stable
30201e7 allowed skipping detection of nonremovable cards on
mmc_rescan(). The intention was to only skip detection of hardwired
cards that cannot be removed, so make sure this is indeed the
case by directly checking for (lack of) MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE, instead
of using mmc_card_is_removable(), which is overloaded with
CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME semantics.
Reported-and-tested-by: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
---
Based on linux-2.6.git master, as this should probably go to Linus.
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index 6625c05..150b5f3 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -1529,7 +1529,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
* still present
*/
if (host->bus_ops && host->bus_ops->detect && !host->bus_dead
- && mmc_card_is_removable(host))
+ && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE))
host->bus_ops->detect(host);
/*
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: fix CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME regression
2011-03-08 21:32 [PATCH] mmc: fix CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME regression Ohad Ben-Cohen
@ 2011-03-08 21:56 ` Chris Ball
2011-03-08 22:20 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ball @ 2011-03-08 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen; +Cc: linux-mmc, Dmitry Shmidt, Maxim Levitsky, stable
Hi Ohad,
On Tue, Mar 08 2011, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> 30201e7 allowed skipping detection of nonremovable cards on
> mmc_rescan(). The intention was to only skip detection of hardwired
> cards that cannot be removed, so make sure this is indeed the
> case by directly checking for (lack of) MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE, instead
> of using mmc_card_is_removable(), which is overloaded with
> CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME semantics.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
> Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
> ---
> Based on linux-2.6.git master, as this should probably go to Linus.
>
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 6625c05..150b5f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -1529,7 +1529,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
> * still present
> */
> if (host->bus_ops && host->bus_ops->detect && !host->bus_dead
> - && mmc_card_is_removable(host))
> + && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE))
> host->bus_ops->detect(host);
>
> /*
Thanks, I will send this to Linus for .38 final.
I have removed the stable@ tag, because the patch causing this
regression was introduced in .38-rc1 -- it has not been part of
any released kernel. So, as long as we fix it before .38 releases
in a week, there's no need to involve stable@.
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: fix CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME regression
2011-03-08 21:56 ` Chris Ball
@ 2011-03-08 22:20 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen @ 2011-03-08 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Ball; +Cc: linux-mmc, Dmitry Shmidt, Maxim Levitsky, stable
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> wrote:
> I have removed the stable@ tag, because the patch causing this
> regression was introduced in .38-rc1 -- it has not been part of
> any released kernel. So, as long as we fix it before .38 releases
> in a week, there's no need to involve stable@.
Thanks, Chris.
I misread git describe; v2.6.37-3748-g30201e7 is of course post-2.6.37 material.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-08 22:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-08 21:32 [PATCH] mmc: fix CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME regression Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-03-08 21:56 ` Chris Ball
2011-03-08 22:20 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.