[LARTC] Re: [Masq] Tunnelling Via Linux

[LARTC] Re: [Masq] Tunnelling Via Linux

[Juda Barnes]

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Ranch" <dranch@trinnet.net>
To: "Juda Barnes" <juda@pent900.com>; <masq@indyramp.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Masq] Tunnelling Via Linux


>  >Well my ISP using That kind of Tunnel   (See below)
>  >
>  >It is called 'NOS'
>
> Not really.. this is a basic IP/IP tunnel.  Very old stuff.

Well the BASIC  thats GREAT but i wouldnt able to set it up   ;-(
i have allready read the Adv-Routing-HOWTO (About 6 times    the part
5.2.    )

and i have tried to
ifconfig tunl0 10.0.1.1 pointopoint 172.19.20.21
route add -net 10.0.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev tunl0

but it dont work  :(
there are   3 ip factories   and in that  basic there are only 2
i need to supply the system   : tunnel source 'Thats my ADSL Fixed IP'
 tunnel dest   'Thats the Router Which host my Tunnel'
 (' i think thats the pointopoint filled ' )
my ip on the tunnel  'the tunnel is 4 ips 11.201.0.8/30'
 'my ip is 11.201.0.10 and the other
 is 9 so i should be able to ping there '

Any idea ???


>
>
>  >Tunnel2 is up, line protocol is up
>  >  Hardware is Tunnel
>  >  Internet address is 10.200.0.2/30
>  >  MTU 1514 bytes, BW 9 Kbit, DLY 500000 usec,
>  >     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 56/255
>  >  Encapsulation TUNNEL, loopback not set
>  >  Keepalive set (10 sec)
>  >  Tunnel source 62.219.161.125, destination 212.25.114.74
>  >  Tunnel protocol/transport IP/IP (NOS), key disabled, sequencing
disabled
>  >  Checksumming of packets disabled
>  >  Last input 00:00:00, output never, output hang never
>  >  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
>  >  Queueing strategy: fifo
>  >  Output queue 0/0, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
>  >  30 second input rate 2000 bits/sec, 4 packets/sec
>  >  30 second output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>  >     300 packets input, 14322 bytes, 0 no buffer
>  >     Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
>  >     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
>  >     0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
>  >     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
>  >     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
>
>
> Ultimately, I don't recommend IP/IP tunnels in a preference
> to GRE tunnels but Linux supports BOTH.
>
> http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO-5.html
>
> --David
>
.---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-.
> |  David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware
dranch@trinnet.net  |
>
      ----!
> `----- For more detailed info, see
http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----'
>
>



_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/