* Re: [LARTC] problem with the howto sample
2001-12-06 22:14 [LARTC] problem with the howto sample Patrick Nagelschmidt
@ 2001-12-06 22:52 ` bert hubert
2001-12-06 23:14 ` Patrick Nagelschmidt
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bert hubert @ 2001-12-06 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:14:01PM +0100, Patrick Nagelschmidt wrote:
> This configuration limits webserver traffic to 5mbit and smtp traffic to 3 mbit, and limits the sum to 5mbit:
> [...]
> # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 10: cbq bandwidth 100Mbit \
> rate 5Mbit weight 0.5Mbit prio 5 allot 1514 cell 8 maxburst 20 \
> avpkt 1000 bounded
>
> the above leads to an Invalid argument. it seems that tc doesnt like the
> classid 10: (at least the error disappears if i change it to e.g. 1:2).
TC likes it just fine. It is the kernel that doesn't. This is my mistake, I
decided to spruce up the examples a bit without testing them afterwards.
> have i done something wrong or is it an error in the example? this problem
Can you check if the CBQ example does work not?
> leads me also to the next question: is the naming of classes essential for
> building them correctly? is parent 1:1 classid 10:0 somehow different from
> parent 1:1 classid 1:2? up to now i thought classid was only a name and
> the parent would be enough to make the classes' positions in the tree
> unambiguously...
Well, major numbers are a bit special in this respect. There is some stuff
going on with userspace per-socket specified PRIOs helping classify traffic,
the kernel does a lot of testing if you remain within your major number.
This is one of the completely never ever mentioned parts of CBQ which I hope
to bug people about.
Added you to the Thanks To list, thanks!
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services
Trilab The Technology People
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available -
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] problem with the howto sample
2001-12-06 22:14 [LARTC] problem with the howto sample Patrick Nagelschmidt
2001-12-06 22:52 ` bert hubert
@ 2001-12-06 23:14 ` Patrick Nagelschmidt
2001-12-06 23:19 ` bert hubert
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Nagelschmidt @ 2001-12-06 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
At 06.12.01, you wrote:
>Can you check if the CBQ example does work not?
this was the cbq example :)
or do you mean besides this classid?
>Added you to the Thanks To list
and i allready feared to get a RTFM as reply ;)
regards,
Patrick
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] problem with the howto sample
2001-12-06 22:14 [LARTC] problem with the howto sample Patrick Nagelschmidt
2001-12-06 22:52 ` bert hubert
2001-12-06 23:14 ` Patrick Nagelschmidt
@ 2001-12-06 23:19 ` bert hubert
2001-12-07 0:17 ` Patrick Nagelschmidt
2001-12-07 4:35 ` Michael T. Babcock
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bert hubert @ 2001-12-06 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Patrick Nagelschmidt wrote:
> At 06.12.01, you wrote:
> >Can you check if the CBQ example does work not?
>
> this was the cbq example :)
> or do you mean besides this classid?
'does work now' I mean :-) I just improved it, please see if it helped.
> >Added you to the Thanks To list
>
> and i allready feared to get a RTFM as reply ;)
We're not quite good enough yet that you can feel confident that everything
in the HOWTO is correct. So continue beating on it!
Regards,
bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services
Trilab The Technology People
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available -
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] problem with the howto sample
2001-12-06 22:14 [LARTC] problem with the howto sample Patrick Nagelschmidt
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2001-12-06 23:19 ` bert hubert
@ 2001-12-07 0:17 ` Patrick Nagelschmidt
2001-12-07 4:35 ` Michael T. Babcock
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Nagelschmidt @ 2001-12-07 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
At 07.12.01, you wrote:
>I just improved it, please see if it helped.
now everything from the cbq example executes without errors.
i can't tell you if it works the way it should since i'm
still learning to understand what it should do ;)
regards,
Patrick
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] problem with the howto sample
2001-12-06 22:14 [LARTC] problem with the howto sample Patrick Nagelschmidt
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2001-12-07 0:17 ` Patrick Nagelschmidt
@ 2001-12-07 4:35 ` Michael T. Babcock
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael T. Babcock @ 2001-12-07 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:14:01PM +0100, Patrick Nagelschmidt wrote:
> is the naming of classes essential for building them correctly? is
> parent 1:1 classid 10:0 somehow different from parent 1:1 classid 1:2?
> up to now i thought classid was only a name and the parent would be
> enough to make the classes' positions in the tree unambiguously...
If we were to rework the naming, something like ...
1) parent 1: classid 1:2
2) parent 1:2 classid 1:2:5
3) parent 1:2:5 classid 1:2:5:8
... would make more sense.
The numbering scheme currently in place makes very little sense and is
quite wasteful of the number-space it uses (not that it matters much to
most people).
If the above were used, 'parent' would become quite unnecessary of course.
--
Michael T. Babcock
CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc)
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread