From: Shanker Balan <shanu@exocore.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] 1st default gateway is always dead!
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:12:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-101134469417080@msgid-missing> (raw)
Hello:
I have been trying to use multiple default gateways over the last 2 days
on my Debian box and have been fairly successful in understanding the
fundas. Bert, thanx a lot for all those wonderful documentation at
http://www.ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/.
Something strange is happening when I try adding multiple default
gateways:
# ip ro add default nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 \
nexthop via 192.168.3.254 dev eth2
# ip ro ls
192.168.3.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.3.24
192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.254
192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.24
default
nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 weight 1 dead
nexthop via 192.168.3.254 dev eth2 weight 1 ^^^^
The first nexthop is _always_ marked dead for some reason though my
primary gateway "192.168.1.100" _is_ reachable via eth0.
# ping 192.168.1.100 -c 3
PING 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl%5 time=0.5 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl%5 time=0.5 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl%5 time=0.5 ms
Since the first gw is marked as dead, all the traffic was routed out via
eth2 to my secondary gateway "192.168.3.254". Load balancing was not
happening.
Why is the first default nexthop marked dead even though it is
reachable? This has happened to one other person according the LARTC
archives, but no solution was discussed.
So i tried a hack, i specified the same gateway twice and it started to
work! :)
# ip ro add default nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 \
nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 \
nexthop via 192.168.3.254 dev eth2
godzilla:~# ip ro ls
192.168.3.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.3.24
192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.254
192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.24
default
nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 weight 1 dead
nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 weight 1 ^^^^
nexthop via 192.168.3.254 dev eth2 weight 1
# traceroute cnn.com
traceroute: Warning: cnn.com has multiple addresses; using 207.25.71.28
traceroute to cnn.com (207.25.71.28), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 192.168.3.254 (192.168.3.254) 0.776 ms 0.657 ms 0.415 ms
[..]
# traceroute in.yahoo.com
traceroute to vip2.in.yahoo.com (203.199.70.100), 30 hops max, 38 byte
packets
1 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 0.858 ms 0.505 ms 0.380 ms
[..]
Could anyone explain why the first nexthop is marked dead?
Thank you for your time.
-- Shanu
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
next reply other threads:[~2002-01-18 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-18 9:12 Shanker Balan [this message]
2002-01-18 9:41 ` [LARTC] 1st default gateway is always dead! Pierrick Hascoet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-101134469417080@msgid-missing \
--to=shanu@exocore.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.