All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LARTC] 1st default gateway is always dead!
@ 2002-01-18  9:12 Shanker Balan
  2002-01-18  9:41 ` Pierrick Hascoet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shanker Balan @ 2002-01-18  9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Hello:

I have been trying to use multiple default gateways over the last 2 days
on my Debian box and have been fairly successful in understanding the
fundas. Bert, thanx a lot for all those wonderful documentation at
http://www.ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/.


Something strange is happening when I try adding multiple default
gateways:

# ip ro add default nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 \
					nexthop via 192.168.3.254 dev eth2

# ip ro ls
192.168.3.0/24 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.3.24 
192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.2.254 
192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.24 
default 
		nexthop via 192.168.1.100  dev eth0 weight 1 dead
		nexthop via 192.168.3.254  dev eth2 weight 1 ^^^^


The first nexthop is _always_ marked dead for some reason though my
primary gateway "192.168.1.100" _is_ reachable via eth0.

# ping 192.168.1.100 -c 3
PING 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl%5 time=0.5 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl%5 time=0.5 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl%5 time=0.5 ms


Since the first gw is marked as dead, all the traffic was routed out via
eth2 to my secondary gateway "192.168.3.254". Load balancing was not
happening.

Why is the first default nexthop marked dead even though it is
reachable? This has happened to one other person according the LARTC
archives, but no solution was discussed.

So i tried a hack, i specified the same gateway twice and it started to
work! :)

# ip ro add default nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 \
					nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 \
					nexthop via 192.168.3.254 dev eth2

godzilla:~# ip ro ls
192.168.3.0/24 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.3.24 
192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.2.254 
192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.24 
default 
		nexthop via 192.168.1.100  dev eth0 weight 1 dead
		nexthop via 192.168.1.100  dev eth0 weight 1 ^^^^
		nexthop via 192.168.3.254  dev eth2 weight 1
						

# traceroute cnn.com 
traceroute: Warning: cnn.com has multiple addresses; using 207.25.71.28
traceroute to cnn.com (207.25.71.28), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
 1  192.168.3.254 (192.168.3.254)  0.776 ms  0.657 ms  0.415 ms
 [..]

# traceroute in.yahoo.com
traceroute to vip2.in.yahoo.com (203.199.70.100), 30 hops max, 38 byte
packets
 1  192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100)  0.858 ms  0.505 ms  0.380 ms
 [..]


Could anyone explain why the first nexthop is marked dead?

Thank you for your time.

-- Shanu
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] 1st default gateway is always dead!
  2002-01-18  9:12 [LARTC] 1st default gateway is always dead! Shanker Balan
@ 2002-01-18  9:41 ` Pierrick Hascoet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pierrick Hascoet @ 2002-01-18  9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc


This bug is fixed, the patch and explanations from Bert can be found here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lartc&m\x100885677229167&w=2

Best regards,
Pierrick.


On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Shanker Balan wrote:

> Hello:
> 
> I have been trying to use multiple default gateways over the last 2 days
> on my Debian box and have been fairly successful in understanding the
> fundas. Bert, thanx a lot for all those wonderful documentation at
> http://www.ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/.
> 
> 
> Something strange is happening when I try adding multiple default
> gateways:
> 
> # ip ro add default nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 \
> 					nexthop via 192.168.3.254 dev eth2
> 
> # ip ro ls
> 192.168.3.0/24 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.3.24 
> 192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.2.254 
> 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.24 
> default 
> 		nexthop via 192.168.1.100  dev eth0 weight 1 dead
> 		nexthop via 192.168.3.254  dev eth2 weight 1 ^^^^
> 
> 
> The first nexthop is _always_ marked dead for some reason though my
> primary gateway "192.168.1.100" _is_ reachable via eth0.
> 
> # ping 192.168.1.100 -c 3
> PING 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl%5 time=0.5 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl%5 time=0.5 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl%5 time=0.5 ms
> 
> 
> Since the first gw is marked as dead, all the traffic was routed out via
> eth2 to my secondary gateway "192.168.3.254". Load balancing was not
> happening.
> 
> Why is the first default nexthop marked dead even though it is
> reachable? This has happened to one other person according the LARTC
> archives, but no solution was discussed.
> 
> So i tried a hack, i specified the same gateway twice and it started to
> work! :)
> 
> # ip ro add default nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 \
> 					nexthop via 192.168.1.100 dev eth0 \
> 					nexthop via 192.168.3.254 dev eth2
> 
> godzilla:~# ip ro ls
> 192.168.3.0/24 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.3.24 
> 192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.2.254 
> 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.24 
> default 
> 		nexthop via 192.168.1.100  dev eth0 weight 1 dead
> 		nexthop via 192.168.1.100  dev eth0 weight 1 ^^^^
> 		nexthop via 192.168.3.254  dev eth2 weight 1
> 						
> 
> # traceroute cnn.com 
> traceroute: Warning: cnn.com has multiple addresses; using 207.25.71.28
> traceroute to cnn.com (207.25.71.28), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
>  1  192.168.3.254 (192.168.3.254)  0.776 ms  0.657 ms  0.415 ms
>  [..]
> 
> # traceroute in.yahoo.com
> traceroute to vip2.in.yahoo.com (203.199.70.100), 30 hops max, 38 byte
> packets
>  1  192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100)  0.858 ms  0.505 ms  0.380 ms
>  [..]
> 
> 
> Could anyone explain why the first nexthop is marked dead?
> 
> Thank you for your time.
> 
> -- Shanu
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-18  9:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-18  9:12 [LARTC] 1st default gateway is always dead! Shanker Balan
2002-01-18  9:41 ` Pierrick Hascoet

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.