* [LARTC] ip route add nexthop dead question
@ 2002-01-30 9:19 Robert Sander
2002-01-30 9:38 ` Julian Anastasov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert Sander @ 2002-01-30 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi!
The question in short:
I try to add a route over two interfaces with the "nexthop" option to
ip, but one of the gateways is always marked dead. How could that be?
Long story:
I have a testbed setup like the following picture:
+-----------------------------+
192.168.96.1/24 192.168.96.2/24
| |
192.168.112.0/20 -- Router A Router B --
192.168.64.0/20
| |
192.168.101.9/30 192.168.101.5/30
| |
192.168.101.10 - Router C - 192.168.101.6/30
Router C knows how to find 192.168.64.0/20 and 192.168.112.0/20, so I am
able to either set a route between these two networks over router C or
the direct link between A and B. That works perfectly.
But when I now try to add a route over both connections with equal cost
multipath, one of them is always marked dead.
on router A
ip r a 192.168.64.0/20 \
nexthop via 192.168.96.2 dev eth1 \
nexthop via 192.168.101.10 dev eth4
gives
192.168.64.0/20
nexthop via 192.168.96.2 dev eth1 weight 1
nexthop via 192.168.101.10 dev eth4 weight 1 dead
and the other way round
ip r a 192.168.64.0/20 \
nexthop via 192.168.101.10 dev eth4 \
nexthop via 192.168.96.2 dev eth1
gives
192.168.64.0/20
nexthop via 192.168.101.10 dev eth4 weight 1
nexthop via 192.168.96.2 dev eth1 weight 1 dead
Kernel is 2.4.17, all advanced routing options are turned on.
I just learned from
http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/2001q4/001142.html
that equal cost multipath is broken in 2.4.13. Is that still true for 2.4.17?
Greetings
--
Robert Sander
Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG
Bioinformatics R&D www.epigenomics.com Kastanienallee 24
+493024345330 10435 Berlin
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] ip route add nexthop dead question
2002-01-30 9:19 [LARTC] ip route add nexthop dead question Robert Sander
@ 2002-01-30 9:38 ` Julian Anastasov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Julian Anastasov @ 2002-01-30 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Robert Sander wrote:
> I try to add a route over two interfaces with the "nexthop" option to
> ip, but one of the gateways is always marked dead. How could that be?
Try with the newest iproute2 version from this year:
ftp://ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/
this problem is fixed there. May be
iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try.tar.gz
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-30 9:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-30 9:19 [LARTC] ip route add nexthop dead question Robert Sander
2002-01-30 9:38 ` Julian Anastasov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.