* [LARTC] Zebra, Routing ...
@ 2002-02-14 19:05 Michael T. Babcock
2002-02-14 20:31 ` Michael T. Babcock
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael T. Babcock @ 2002-02-14 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Before I start, I don't want to do ECMP or simple bonding ...
I have multiple Internet connections available to multiple boxes on one
of my networks.
Box A connects to ISPs 1, 2 and 3
Box B connects to ISPs 1 and 4
Boxes A and B are both connected to each other and the rest of the
network.
1) I would like to set up some dynamic routing in such a way that any
given outgoing packet from Box A or B would go out over the ISP that had
the "best" path (according to BGP) to the destination. I would like to
be able to assign 'weights' to these routes (based on their available
bandwidth), but it is not necessary.
2) I would like to have any given *nix box on the network pick the right
gateway (A or B) given the destination of its packets.
I understand that I could do 1) easily if I had a BGP AS#, but I don't.
Is it possible to arrange 'private' peering arrangements so I could
download the BGP views each ISP had without needing a public AS# (don't
tell me I should get one -- it probably won't happen).
Am I correct in assuming that OSPF (which I currently have installed) is
the best way to handle route distribution within the network (#2
above)? Is there a 'good' way to configure it with as few rules as
possible?
I'm going to send this to the Zebra list as well once I find my address
book entry for them, but I thought somebody here might have good answers
too.
--
Michael T. Babcock
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Zebra, Routing ...
2002-02-14 19:05 [LARTC] Zebra, Routing Michael T. Babcock
@ 2002-02-14 20:31 ` Michael T. Babcock
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael T. Babcock @ 2002-02-14 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 15:17, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> No. OSPF is wrong for inter domain routing. You need to speak BGP.
You misunderstood; OSPF would communicate the routes within my network
to the other boxes on my network. IBGP would be equally productive and
RIP would be workable too if I didn't already have OSPF support.
> I believe you can get zebra to run multiple BGP instances, and dump each
> into a seperate routing table.. you can then use iproute2 to make differnt
> packets use differnt tables.
That seems overly complex considering Zebra should (IMHO) know how to
cull a routing table from multiple BGP4 sessions ... its sort of why
BGP4 exists at all.
I understand the technical side (and packet-side, for that matter) of
how the various routing protocols work; I'm just not familiar with
actually configuring the exterior routing protocols on a box. Maybe I
should tuck a Cisco course feather into my hat ...
--
Michael T. Babcock
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-14 20:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-14 19:05 [LARTC] Zebra, Routing Michael T. Babcock
2002-02-14 20:31 ` Michael T. Babcock
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.