Re: [LARTC] Has anybody used HTB?

[Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz>]

Your setup doesn't make much sense. Two htbs can be done
but there is no benefit.
tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 100:2 handle 102:1 is wrong
because each qdisc handle takes form X:0 not X:1 ...
devik

On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, eth wrote:

>     Until now I've been using HTB instead of CBQ and it worked quite 
> good. I try now to prio ICMP and SSHwith the following:
> 
> tc_htb qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 10
> 
>  # total
>  #78Kbytes 
>  tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 76kbps ceil 78kbps 
> burst 2k
> 
>  #50Kbytes 
>  tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 48kbps ceil 
> 76kbps burst 2k
>    #PRIO as qdisk for this slice
>    tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:10 handle 100: prio
>      #I try to avoid a situation where a "massive" ping would disrupt 
> everything else
>      tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 100:1 handle 101 tbf rate 8kbps 
> latency 1500ms burst 1540
>      #The second band (probably HTTP) shouldn't eat everything from FTP 
> which should be tc filtered in band 3...
>      tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 100:2 handle 102:1 htb default 100221
> 
>      tc class add dev eth1 parent 102:1 classid 1002:1 htb rate 40kbps 
> ceil 76kbps burst 2k   
> 
> ... and the last line gives me an error:    RTNETLINK answers: Invalid 
> argument. Why?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/