Re: [LARTC] Has anybody used HTB?

[eth <eth@finsiel.ro>]

Martin Devera wrote:

>Your setup doesn't make much sense. Two htbs can be done
>but there is no benefit.
>
Well... what I'm trying to do is to get a 50Kbytes/s slice in which ICMP 
and ssh should work perceptible faster than other and, below, http 
should work perceptible faster than the rest. I try to put the first htb 
for the 50K overall limit and then make PRIO as qdisc for the first htb. 
Each of the bands from this PRIO should have some form of limitting and 
I thought htb would do nice here to. In my view (everybody, please 
correct me if I'm wrong...) there should be some form of upper limit for 
the bands of PRIO so I can avoid the sittuation where e.g. 15 machines 
start to ping so the PRIO's band 0 is always full and no other traffic 
works...

>tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 100:2 handle 102:1 is wrong
>because each qdisc handle takes form X:0 not X:1 ...
>devik
>
Thanks, I'll try it. :)

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/