From: Kelly Scroggins <kelly@cliffhanger.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] What method to use when NATing
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 00:59:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-101701797503787@msgid-missing> (raw)
There are two ways to NAT with 2.4.x that I am
aware of. One is to use the ipmasq rule, and the
other is to use the ip utility's 'ip rule'
command.
What are the differences, and why would I want to
use one way over the other?
kelly
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2002-03-25 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-25 0:59 Kelly Scroggins [this message]
2002-03-25 9:13 ` [LARTC] What method to use when NATing bert hubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-101701797503787@msgid-missing \
--to=kelly@cliffhanger.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.