[LARTC] What method to use when NATing

[LARTC] What method to use when NATing

[Kelly Scroggins]

There are two ways to NAT with 2.4.x that I am
aware of.  One is to use the ipmasq rule, and the
other is to use the ip utility's 'ip rule'
command.

What are the differences, and why would I want to
use one way over the other?

kelly


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] What method to use when NATing

[bert hubert]

On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 07:00:20PM -0600, Kelly Scroggins wrote:
> There are two ways to NAT with 2.4.x that I am
> aware of.  One is to use the ipmasq rule, and the
> other is to use the ip utility's 'ip rule'
> command.

The iptables way is used more, but is probably a few nanoseconds slower. The
ip rule command is not used a lot but does involve very little code.

I would personally always use the iptables command because the
iptables/netfilter community is so much more helpful.

Regards,

bert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://www.tk                              the dot in .tk
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/