From: Bob Gustafson <bobgus@mcs.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 06:01:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-101893695108357@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-101890143014670@msgid-missing>
>On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Bob Gustafson wrote:
>
>> What I would like to do is cleanly move packets out to the Internet over
>> two (maybe 3) separate interfaces, utilizing all of the bandwidth, and
>> avoiding snags.
>
>[snip, lots of nice interesting wishes]
>
>> Does such a beast exist? Is it possible to build with current
>> ip/tc/netfilter technology? I am running a near stock RH 7.2 at the
>> moment. Each ISP line is going through a separate (proprietary/black-box)
>> firewall/router and then into the RH7.2 box.
>
>QoS and routing are basically independent of each other. Orthogonal,
>mathematicians would say. Furthermore, there *is* in fact a patch floating
>around somewhere on the internet that flushes the route cache after every
>packet... that might help. I've never used it, as I don't trust it to keep
>TCP connections intact, but still, it might prove useful.
>
>You'll have to do some digging on your own though...
I was afraid of that. But this list was the first place to dig, yes?
>
>Doei, Arthur. (Oh, and it is Arthur van Leeuwen. The surname is
> 'van Leeuwen'. Kinda like in 'Ludwig van Beethoven')
Ahh, learn something every day. The van *isn't* just like a middle name then.
(I was pretty careful about the spelling of Leeuwen though :-)
Thanks much for the feedback
BobG
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-16 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-15 20:08 [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers ?? Bob Gustafson
2002-04-15 21:55 ` [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-04-16 6:01 ` Bob Gustafson [this message]
2002-04-16 6:56 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-04-16 11:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2002-04-16 13:38 ` Mihai RUSU
2002-04-16 13:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2002-04-16 14:14 ` Mihai RUSU
2002-04-16 20:01 ` Bob Gustafson
2002-04-16 20:26 ` Don Cohen
2002-04-16 21:38 ` Bob Gustafson
2002-04-28 15:27 ` [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers ?? mikee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-101893695108357@msgid-missing \
--to=bobgus@mcs.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.