[LARTC] simple question

[LARTC] simple question

[Mihai RUSU]

Hi

If not ataching any qdisc disc to a cba/htb leaf class what does that
mean? There will be a default fifo style queue ? Or there will be no queue
at all on the leaf class?

Also if deleting any existing qdisc on a device (tc qdisc del dev eth0
root) what it will happen with the packets destined to go out on that
interface?

My tests show that the packets still go out only that I am not sure if
there is any queue on that device.

Thanks

----------------------------
Mihai RUSU

Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any company,
unless otherwise specifically stated.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] simple question

[Patrick McHardy]

pfifo is attached if not other specified. if no qdisc is attached to an 
interface at all pfifo_fast will be used.

bye patrick

Mihai RUSU wrote:
> Hi
> 
> If not ataching any qdisc disc to a cba/htb leaf class what does that
> mean? There will be a default fifo style queue ? Or there will be no queue
> at all on the leaf class?
> 
> Also if deleting any existing qdisc on a device (tc qdisc del dev eth0
> root) what it will happen with the packets destined to go out on that
> interface?
> 
> My tests show that the packets still go out only that I am not sure if
> there is any queue on that device.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> ----------------------------
> Mihai RUSU
> 
> Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely
> those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any company,
> unless otherwise specifically stated.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/



_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] simple question

[Jason C. Leach]

hi,

So I have the following:

ROUTER 10.0.0.254
|
10.0.0.3(eth0) 
MY_DEBIAN_RTR 
209.52.x.126(eth1)
|
LAN (the 209.52.x.64/26 subnet)


I need to route the 209.52.x.64 subnet through MY_DEBIAN_RTR
and on to the telephone company router. I'd probably like
209.52.x to have it's own table (if that is a good idea).
The debian box will eventually do some firewalling, and some
traffic monitoring. But first I have to get the traffic flowing.

I have read some docs, and the HOTO, but they were not too
much help.

Thanks,
j.



-- 
......................
..... Jason C. Leach
.. 

Current PGP/GPG Key ID: 43AD2024 
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] simple question

[LIEVEN]

As you can confirm in your own draw that you shown us, you have 
different nets . You need :

1.- A static route to ROUTER 10.0.0.254 from de LAN 209 

or 

2.- Configure some routing protocols like RIP  with Zebra suite.

These configurations tipe are the same as Cisco routers, for any 
configurations problem you can look at www.cisco.com and 
search "configuring RIP" for example

Best Regards!!!!

LievenX

-.-.LievenX..--.

----- Mensaje Original -----
De: "Jason C. Leach" <jleach@ocis.net>
Fecha: Jueves, Septiembre 26, 2002 4:47 am
Asunto: [LARTC] simple question

> hi,
> 
> So I have the following:
> 
> ROUTER 10.0.0.254
> |
> 10.0.0.3(eth0) 
> MY_DEBIAN_RTR 
> 209.52.x.126(eth1)
> |
> LAN (the 209.52.x.64/26 subnet)
> 
> 
> I need to route the 209.52.x.64 subnet through MY_DEBIAN_RTR
> and on to the telephone company router. I'd probably like
> 209.52.x to have it's own table (if that is a good idea).
> The debian box will eventually do some firewalling, and some
> traffic monitoring. But first I have to get the traffic flowing.
> 
> I have read some docs, and the HOTO, but they were not too
> much help.
> 
> Thanks,
> j.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ......................
> ..... Jason C. Leach
> .. 
> 
> Current PGP/GPG Key ID: 43AD2024 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> 


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] Simple question

[Joseph Watson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

I have a linuxbox running shorewall, and on the lan side nic I have multiple 
networks, and ip's from both assigned to the nic.  One network is private, 
and the other is public ip's.  I have a web server running on the firewall 
with multiple virtual hosts configured.  I have the private ip on the lan 
tied to the default apache config, and the public ip on the lan tied to a 
vurtual configuration.  Also the public ip on the wan is tied to another 
virtual host.

I want all web traffic on the private network that is trying to go through the 
firewall to get forwarded to the firewall and be answered by the apache 
default config.  All this config will do is redirects the request to my 
domain.  So no matter where they try to go, they will end up at my page.  The 
following will do the trick.

ACCEPT  lan:192.168.1.0/24    fw:192.168.1.1:80  tcp     http  - all

I think it is required to specify the 192.168.1.1 on the firewall so it is 
answered by the proper apache config.  Am I right?  The 192.168.1.1 is the 
main ip on the nic, and the public ip is a alias.

Then came the question, will the following rule do the same thing?

ACCEPT  lan:192.168.1.0/24    lan:192.168.1.1:80  tcp     http  - all

Would this act any different?

- -- 
Regards

Joseph Watson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9l9v5ABydhMNsDgMRAqX/AJ49x9j4fK4eVuwfQJMxA15YWKdHoACgzhKv
mGExxcT5A/DK6prz2L1yBog=
=z1pS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Simple question

[Joseph Watson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 30 September 2002 01:07 am, Joseph Watson wrote:
> Hello,
>

Sorry I have the wrong list here :)

- -- 
Regards

Joseph Watson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9l92+ABydhMNsDgMRAp1vAJ9wUqtPWCqXGOqVN2hu+dJtX+oKFQCgkBub
7DK5G7KEIqa3EwkbZUeiIXc=
=HiAH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] simple question

[Ferdinando Formica]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc