* Re: RE: [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers ??
@ 2002-04-29 9:41 mikee
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: mikee @ 2002-04-29 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
From: "andrew@foxtrot.kiev.ua" <andrew@foxtrot.kiev.ua>
> Why don't he(she) use nth patch from the pom for load ballancing?
> It works fine for me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrew Kozachenko
i haven't said it clearly but he has links to 3 DIFFERENT ISP (3 different IP),
so nth packet marking isn't enough - all outgoing packets belonging to connection
must be sent through same link to have uniform "external" ip
regards,
mikee
__________________________
ignore ads below this line
-------------------------------------------------
zrób sympatii niespodziankê i wy¶lij logo AA.101431
SMS na numer 7116 koszt 1 zl + Vat :: Idea, Era i Plus Gsm www.toplogo.pl
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-04-29 9:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-29 9:41 RE: [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers ?? mikee
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.