[LARTC] HTB on VLAN interfaces

[LARTC] HTB on VLAN interfaces

[Lumir Unzeitig]

Hi,
does anybody have experience with traffic control on VLAN interfaces?
I 'd like to share a link from ISP  to 8 VLAN segments (= 8 virt.
interfaces-vlan000x are binded to 1 physical -eth0 ).

Q1:
Shall I define the classes on the physical or the virtual interfaces?

Q2:
Can a 64kbits bandwidth from ISP be successfully controled to 8 subjects
(minimal assured bw=8kbits) ? (=relatively small bw divided to much smaller
parts).



Thanks


Lumir Unzeitig

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB on VLAN interfaces

[Martin Devera]

Q1: -on phys, iface it will work but will be hard to filter.
    -i've been told by one user that it works with virtual vlan ifaces

but because you want to share between these interfaces you will want
to use physical one and use iptables to define classes (or u32 filter
and match vlan-id directly)

Q2: in my tests I validate HTB from 1kbit/s succesfully.
devik

On Mon, 6 May 2002, Lumir Unzeitig wrote:

> Hi,
> does anybody have experience with traffic control on VLAN interfaces?
> I 'd like to share a link from ISP  to 8 VLAN segments (= 8 virt.
> interfaces-vlan000x are binded to 1 physical -eth0 ).
>
> Q1:
> Shall I define the classes on the physical or the virtual interfaces?
>
> Q2:
> Can a 64kbits bandwidth from ISP be successfully controled to 8 subjects
> (minimal assured bw=8kbits) ? (=relatively small bw divided to much smaller
> parts).
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Lumir Unzeitig
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

RE: [LARTC] HTB on VLAN interfaces

[Lumir Unzeitig]

Q1: -on phys. iface it will work but will be hard to filter.
 ..... 1 VLAN ~ 1 IP segment ,  in this case I can filter according to dest.
IP addres on internal iface (I hope)...........

    -i've been told by one user that it works with virtual vlan ifaces

Thanks
Lumir Unzeitig



-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Devera [mailto:devik@cdi.cz]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Lumir Unzeitig
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB on VLAN interfaces


Q1: -on phys, iface it will work but will be hard to filter.
    -i've been told by one user that it works with virtual vlan ifaces

but because you want to share between these interfaces you will want
to use physical one and use iptables to define classes (or u32 filter
and match vlan-id directly)

Q2: in my tests I validate HTB from 1kbit/s succesfully.
devik

On Mon, 6 May 2002, Lumir Unzeitig wrote:

> Hi,
> does anybody have experience with traffic control on VLAN interfaces?
> I 'd like to share a link from ISP  to 8 VLAN segments (= 8 virt.
> interfaces-vlan000x are binded to 1 physical -eth0 ).
>
> Q1:
> Shall I define the classes on the physical or the virtual interfaces?
>
> Q2:
> Can a 64kbits bandwidth from ISP be successfully controled to 8 subjects
> (minimal assured bw=8kbits) ? (=relatively small bw divided to much
smaller
> parts).
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Lumir Unzeitig
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

RE: [LARTC] HTB on VLAN interfaces

[Martin Devera]

> Q1: -on phys. iface it will work but will be hard to filter.
>  ..... 1 VLAN ~ 1 IP segment ,  in this case I can filter according to dest.
> IP addres on internal iface (I hope)...........

the problem will be in that that physical interface's qdisc will see
packet with vlanid added (probably). So that u32 will not match it.
But iptables should.
devik

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/