All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arthur van Leeuwen <arthurvl@sci.kun.nl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] "Bug" in howto 4.2.1 Split access and other advice
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 18:13:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-102589286401985@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-102589034132084@msgid-missing>

On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Ard van Breemen wrote:

> Hi,
> http://lartc.org/HOWTO//cvs/2.4routing/html/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
> I am not sure who wrote this part or what it was based upon, but
> since I am working a lot longer now with ip rules, I think I want
> to add some stuff:

The stuff that is in the HOWTO was designed and tested back in 1999.
Oh, and I am the author. :)

> The example 4.2.1 refers to the picture above, and does a plain
> ip rule add from .... table ....
> The problem with the exampe is that if you connect from the
> inside (local network) to your if1 ip or if2 ip, that in this
> example the replies to the local-network are going out if1 or
> if2... That is not what you want.

True. That is indeed a bug. Never saw it in actual practice though: you
*should*not* connect to the external IP addresses of your router from
the internal network... for various security reasons and such. But you are
right.

[snip]

Whoa, that was large. I'm not sure I entirely follow you though.
The *point* of the extra routing tables is that they take precedence
over the default routing tables...

Doei, Arthur.

-- 
  /\    / |      arthurvl@sci.kun.nl      | Work like you don't need the money
 /__\  /  | A friend is someone with whom | Love like you have never been hurt
/    \/__ | you can dare to be yourself   | Dance like there's nobody watching

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-05 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-05 17:31 [LARTC] "Bug" in howto 4.2.1 Split access and other advice Ard van Breemen
2002-07-05 18:13 ` Arthur van Leeuwen [this message]
2002-07-05 18:25 ` Laurens van Alphen
2002-07-05 18:39 ` Stef Coene
2002-07-05 18:45 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-07-05 18:47 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-07-05 18:58 ` Stef Coene
2002-07-05 19:05 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-07-05 19:27 ` Stef Coene
2002-07-05 19:39 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-07-05 20:31 ` Julian Anastasov
2002-07-05 21:43 ` Stef Coene
2002-07-08 11:22 ` Ard van Breemen
2002-07-08 11:54 ` Ard van Breemen
2002-07-08 12:15 ` Julian Anastasov
2002-07-08 12:28 ` S Mohan
2002-07-08 13:50 ` 'Ard van Breemen'

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-102589286401985@msgid-missing \
    --to=arthurvl@sci.kun.nl \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.