* [LARTC] Dead Gateway Detection
@ 2002-08-09 5:48 Giorgio Biondi
2002-08-09 6:21 ` Stef Coene
2002-08-09 12:32 ` [LARTC] Dead gateway detection Laurens van Alphen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Giorgio Biondi @ 2002-08-09 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 305 bytes --]
Hi,
I have a linux box loaded with RH7.1, 3 ethernet with load balance on 2 ISP.
In theory, if one router stop to work (I have turn off for this try), the Dead Gateway Detection,
would re-instradate alla traffic on other link. This not work...someone have more experience on this?
Giorgio Biondi
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 936 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Dead Gateway Detection
2002-08-09 5:48 [LARTC] Dead Gateway Detection Giorgio Biondi
@ 2002-08-09 6:21 ` Stef Coene
2002-08-09 12:32 ` [LARTC] Dead gateway detection Laurens van Alphen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2002-08-09 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Friday 09 August 2002 07:48, Giorgio Biondi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a linux box loaded with RH7.1, 3 ethernet with load balance on 2
> ISP. In theory, if one router stop to work (I have turn off for this try),
> the Dead Gateway Detection, would re-instradate alla traffic on other link.
> This not work...someone have more experience on this?
Have you followed the lartc howto chapter 10?
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [LARTC] Dead gateway detection
2002-08-09 5:48 [LARTC] Dead Gateway Detection Giorgio Biondi
2002-08-09 6:21 ` Stef Coene
@ 2002-08-09 12:32 ` Laurens van Alphen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Laurens van Alphen @ 2002-08-09 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi,
I installed the routing patches at
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/#routes for Linux 2.4.19 and
have a few questions:
Q1: In the Nano-HOWTO on your site, it says to include these statements:
"ip route append prohibit default table <tablename> metric 1 proto
static"
Why? What does it do? If I use these I can't connect to the Internet,
without them I can.
Q2: I have the following multipath route to the Internet:
"default proto static
nexthop via GW1 dev eth1 weight 1
nexthop via GW2 dev eth2 weight 1"
If I unplug eth2 the second route is never marked as 'dead', why?
Only if I 'ifconfig eth2 down' the second route is marked dead. I
thought the patches would detect this?
Thanks,
--
Laurens van Alphen
Keen on dots
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-09 12:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-09 5:48 [LARTC] Dead Gateway Detection Giorgio Biondi
2002-08-09 6:21 ` Stef Coene
2002-08-09 12:32 ` [LARTC] Dead gateway detection Laurens van Alphen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.