All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LARTC] TBF to limit bandwidth, Should I change #define HZ?
@ 2002-08-30 20:52 Fernando Lemos de Mello
  2002-08-31 11:28 ` bert hubert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Lemos de Mello @ 2002-08-30 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Dear friends,

thanks for the last advices about TBF.

After reading the tbf.pdf document I got a better insight of the problems I
had trying to limit the bandwith on my testbed with a high resolution.

The question I have now is:
Would I get an immediatly better resolution result if I change the #define
HZ to 1000 for my Linux box? I have a Pentium Celeron 700 MHz, and I would
like to see the tbf working like:

send a 1000 bytes packet -> wait 10ms -> send a 1000 bytes packet -> wait
10ms ....

So if I change the file /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386/param.h: #define HZ
100 to #define HZ 1000 and simply recompile the kernel, would tc work with
better resolution?

Thanks again,

Fernando.


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-31 11:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-30 20:52 [LARTC] TBF to limit bandwidth, Should I change #define HZ? Fernando Lemos de Mello
2002-08-31 11:28 ` bert hubert

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.