* [LARTC] htb attached to prio: makes sense?
@ 2002-10-23 18:33 Walter Haidinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Walter Haidinger @ 2002-10-23 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi!
Does it make sense to create a prio qdisc and attach an
htb qdisc to it? I'm thinking of a configuration like:
root
|
+----- prio 1: -----+
| | |
1:1 1:2 1:3
| | |
sfq 11: htb 12: sfq 13:
|
+-------- 12:1 ---------+
| / | \ |
100: 101: 102: 103: 104: all sfq qdiscs
Really high priority traffic (VoIP) should go to 11:,
normal traffic (and bandwidth limited) to 101:-104:,
low priority traffic (which may starve) to 13:.
Q1: Is this really neccessary or is HTB alone sufficient
(i.e. attaching 12: to the root qdisc) by setting
proper priorities to 100:-104: ?
Q2: Do I attach all filters to 1: or should I attach
to 1: and 12: as required?
Q3: What about performance with an hierarchy like that?
Will this be an issue?
Regards, Walter
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-10-23 18:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-23 18:33 [LARTC] htb attached to prio: makes sense? Walter Haidinger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.