All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Fwd: Re: [LARTC] HTB with SFQ in leaf classes. & setup question
@ 2002-12-10 21:27 lartc
  2002-12-10 21:44 ` Nickola Kolev
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: lartc @ 2002-12-10 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>:

> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 19:48, lartc@e-apollo.lv wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I wrote something yesterday.
> > Now the situation is even worse. Communicatin with some clients wont work
> > at all until i restart the traffic shaping box.
> > (It works for some hours, then suddenly dies (meaning the client cant be
> > pinged. Suspected at peak hours)
> > Maybe the computer resources are weak, maybe its setup faulty
> Do you have any errors in dmesg?  And how is the memory and cpu usage ?

Right now (night) the traffic shaping box is not loaded at all 10% cpu usage and 200MB ram 
used.
Tho at the daytime cpu usage goes up to 70% or so. and ~ 500MB ram.

Yes there are errors.

Dec 10 22:59:28 p1 kernel: NET: 26 messages suppressed.
Dec 10 22:59:28 p1 kernel: HTB: bad diff in events, cl\x10243 diff\x19E26000 nowC4192384 
thenB94893568 j\x1101578
...

Like this.

Just before i left work, i left a file d/ling, to test what happens.
Right now i cant reach outside world from that computer (128MB with speed of 128kbit/s have 
downloaded and it has halted).

I can reach the computer from the computer where the traffic shaping is being done. But not 
from a computer which is a hop from traffic shaping computer

internet - router1 - traffic_shaping - ... - me

80.81.33.1 is the router1 at the ISP providing us 8mbit like.
It cant be reached from the box which was being shaped.

me@myplace$ ping 80.81.33.1
PING 80.81.33.1 (80.81.33.1): 56 octets data

--- 80.81.33.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

Tho it can be reached from box next to me. (my other workstation)
me@myotherpc$ ping 80.81.33.1 
PING 80.81.33.1 (80.81.33.1): 56 octets data
64 octets from 80.81.33.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl%2 timeb.6 ms
64 octets from 80.81.33.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl%2 time .8 ms

--- 80.81.33.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 20.8/41.7/62.6 ms

So there is a problem in the traffic shaping box.
Traceroute also stops at the traffic shaping box.

Huge problem.

Ok, just a second ago i did '/sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth2 root'
And added the classes again.

me@myplace$ ping 80.81.33.1
PING 80.81.33.1 (80.81.33.1): 56 octets data
64 octets from 80.81.33.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl%2 time$.6 ms
64 octets from 80.81.33.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl%2 time!.9 ms

--- 80.81.33.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 21.9/23.2/24.6 ms

I can reach ISP's gateway very smoothly now!


Any idee?


P.Krumins
 ____________________________________________________________
 
 Reìistrç un lieto savu Apollo e-pastu www.e-apollo.lv
 
 www.apollo.lv

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: Re: [LARTC] HTB with SFQ in leaf classes. & setup question
  2002-12-10 21:27 Fwd: Re: [LARTC] HTB with SFQ in leaf classes. & setup question lartc
@ 2002-12-10 21:44 ` Nickola Kolev
  2002-12-10 21:58 ` lartc
  2002-12-10 22:13 ` Nickola Kolev
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nickola Kolev @ 2002-12-10 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 977 bytes --]

On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 23:27:39 +0200
lartc@e-apollo.lv wrote:

> Ok, just a second ago i did '/sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth2 root'
> And added the classes again.
> 
> me@myplace$ ping 80.81.33.1
> PING 80.81.33.1 (80.81.33.1): 56 octets data
> 64 octets from 80.81.33.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=252 time=24.6 ms
> 64 octets from 80.81.33.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=252 time=21.9 ms
> 
> --- 80.81.33.1 ping statistics ---
> 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 21.9/23.2/24.6 ms
> 
> I can reach ISP's gateway very smoothly now!

Hello, I'm running a similar setup with about a thousand clients, separated in several level
 hierarchy. The machine is also similar. I had the same problem half a year ago.

Anyway, can you tell us what is the version of htb? It's htb2, isn't it? Try upgrading to htb3, this 
will solve your problem. If not, just put a crontab job to restart (i.e. delete and the recreate) 
the htb classes every 1/2 hour.

Hth,
Nickola

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: Re: [LARTC] HTB with SFQ in leaf classes. & setup question
  2002-12-10 21:27 Fwd: Re: [LARTC] HTB with SFQ in leaf classes. & setup question lartc
  2002-12-10 21:44 ` Nickola Kolev
@ 2002-12-10 21:58 ` lartc
  2002-12-10 22:13 ` Nickola Kolev
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: lartc @ 2002-12-10 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Nickola Kolev <nikky@mnet.bg>:

> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 23:27:39 +0200
> lartc@e-apollo.lv wrote:
> 
> > Ok, just a second ago i did '/sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth2 root'
> > And added the classes again.
> > 
> > me@myplace$ ping 80.81.33.1
> > PING 80.81.33.1 (80.81.33.1): 56 octets data
> > 64 octets from 80.81.33.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl%2 time$.6 ms
> > 64 octets from 80.81.33.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl%2 time!.9 ms
> > 
> > --- 80.81.33.1 ping statistics ---
> > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
> > round-trip min/avg/max = 21.9/23.2/24.6 ms
> > 
> > I can reach ISP's gateway very smoothly now!
> 
> Hello, I'm running a similar setup with about a thousand clients, separated
> in several level
>  hierarchy. The machine is also similar. I had the same problem half a year
> ago.
> 
> Anyway, can you tell us what is the version of htb? It's htb2, isn't it? Try
> upgrading to htb3, this 
> will solve your problem. 

No, it's htb3.6_2.4.17.diff
HTB 3.6
Tho it's made for 2.4.17 kernels, i am running 2.4.19.

If not, just put a crontab job to restart (i.e.
> delete and the recreate) 
> the htb classes every 1/2 hour.

Yes, i just did it. I hope 1/2 hour is reasonable interval.
Will see what the clients gonna do tomorro.

Btw, how do you solve this problem?

I am about to test it more with 2.4.20 (HTB included) on Sunday


P.Krumins
 ____________________________________________________________
 
 Reìistrç un lieto savu Apollo e-pastu www.e-apollo.lv
 
 www.apollo.lv

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: Re: [LARTC] HTB with SFQ in leaf classes. & setup question
  2002-12-10 21:27 Fwd: Re: [LARTC] HTB with SFQ in leaf classes. & setup question lartc
  2002-12-10 21:44 ` Nickola Kolev
  2002-12-10 21:58 ` lartc
@ 2002-12-10 22:13 ` Nickola Kolev
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nickola Kolev @ 2002-12-10 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 952 bytes --]

On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 23:58:03 +0200
lartc@e-apollo.lv wrote:

[cut]
> > Anyway, can you tell us what is the version of htb? It's htb2, isn't it? Try
> > upgrading to htb3, this 
> > will solve your problem. 
> 
> No, it's htb3.6_2.4.17.diff
> HTB 3.6
> Tho it's made for 2.4.17 kernels, i am running 2.4.19.
[cut]

Hmpf, strange. I'm really sorry that I didn't test and debug this when it was
happening, but this is a production machine and I had to find a solution fast.
But now I'm rid of it (after upgrading to htb3 in may).

[cut]
> > delete and the recreate) 
> > the htb classes every 1/2 hour.
> 
> Yes, i just did it. I hope 1/2 hour is reasonable interval.
> Will see what the clients gonna do tomorro.
> 
> Btw, how do you solve this problem?
> 
> I am about to test it more with 2.4.20 (HTB included) on Sunday
[cut]

Don't worry, half an hour is quite reasonable. :)

And about the solution... emmm... I just upgraded, that's all.


Nickola

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-10 22:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-10 21:27 Fwd: Re: [LARTC] HTB with SFQ in leaf classes. & setup question lartc
2002-12-10 21:44 ` Nickola Kolev
2002-12-10 21:58 ` lartc
2002-12-10 22:13 ` Nickola Kolev

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.