From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + (u32 & fw filters)
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:58:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104154487302263@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104152880716719@msgid-missing>
On Thursday 02 January 2003 18:32, Victor Cassar wrote:
> Hi:
>
> finally i´m working with htb + bridge on 2.4.20 to
> shape ip traffic, and i want to build a system but i´m
> not up2date with these specific driver issues
>
> mi primary need is to shape small bandwidths 128 or
> 256
>
> are there any diferences between these 2 options?
> Since i need more granularity in the queuing
> behavior..i dont know how relevant this decision can
> be..
The chip doesn't mather. All shaping is done in the kernel so in software.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-02 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-02 17:32 [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + (u32 & fw filters) Victor Cassar
2003-01-02 21:58 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2003-01-02 22:30 ` [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + William L. Thomson Jr.
2003-01-02 23:13 ` [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + (u32 & fw filters) Victor Cassar
2003-01-03 17:17 ` Victor Cassar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-03 2:07 John Bäckstrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104154487302263@msgid-missing \
--to=stef.coene@docum.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.