From: Victor Cassar <victorcassar@yahoo.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + (u32 & fw filters)
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 23:13:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104154927106998@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104152880716719@msgid-missing>
Yea my gut want intels i´m just making sure...
some times i read diferent things in linux or bsd
routing projects about that some cards being better
than others, issues about the tulip chip (dec), 3coms,
etc
and since i had some problems in the past with earlier
version of 2.x having multiple 3c905, i´m asking know
agree with you and thanks for the reply
--- "William L. Thomson Jr."
<support@obsidian-studios.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 13:58, Stef Coene wrote:
> >
> > The chip doesn't mather. All shaping is done in
> the kernel so in software.
> >
>
> With that said, I use and recommend Intel nics. I
> used to use some 3com
> ones, but they were crap.
>
> I personally like the 82557-9, mostly the 9's since
> they are tiny.
>
> But basically any Intel card that is supported by
> the e100 driver. The
> e100 driver for Intel cards is my favorite. Intel is
> always releasing
> new versions. Not to mention the IANS software that
> is also available.
>
> My two cents, Intel all the way.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> William L. Thomson Jr.
> Support Group
> Obsidian-Studios Inc.
> 439 Amber Way
> Petaluma, Ca. 94952
> Phone 707.766.9509
> Fax 707.766.8989
> http://www.obsidian-studios.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:
http://lartc.org/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-02 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-02 17:32 [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + (u32 & fw filters) Victor Cassar
2003-01-02 21:58 ` Stef Coene
2003-01-02 22:30 ` [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + William L. Thomson Jr.
2003-01-02 23:13 ` Victor Cassar [this message]
2003-01-03 17:17 ` [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + (u32 & fw filters) Victor Cassar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-03 2:07 John Bäckstrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104154927106998@msgid-missing \
--to=victorcassar@yahoo.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.