All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LARTC] Routing based on fwmark
@ 2003-03-04 18:27 David Watson
  2003-03-04 18:58 ` Martin A. Brown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Watson @ 2003-03-04 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc


	I'm having trouble routing on high fwmarks, I want to use a lot of 
different marks for 2 routes so that I can QoS based on the marks
ip rule looks like this:

0:      from all lookup local
32751:  from all fwmark       31 lookup dslout
32752:  from all fwmark       30 lookup dslout
32753:  from all fwmark       29 lookup dslout
32754:  from all fwmark       28 lookup dslout
32755:  from all fwmark       27 lookup dslout
32756:  from all fwmark       26 lookup dslout
32757:  from all fwmark       25 lookup dslout
32758:  from all fwmark       24 lookup dslout
32759:  from all fwmark       21 lookup dslout
32760:  from all fwmark       11 lookup dslout
32761:  from all fwmark       10 lookup fibout
32762:  from all fwmark        8 lookup dslout
32763:  from all fwmark        7 lookup fibout
32764:  from all fwmark        2 lookup dslout
32765:  from all fwmark        1 lookup fibout
32766:  from all lookup main
32767:  from all lookup default


now when I mark say web traffic with 8 or 2 it goes to the dslout table, 
but if I use 11 or 21 it doesn't. I guess I've a limited number of marks to 
play with?


kernel 2.4.20, iptables 1.2.7.a with wrr and imq


Thanks
_____________________________________________________________
David Watson, Network Manager, Team17 Software Ltd.
Phone: +44-1924-267776			Fax: +44-1924-267658
_____________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [LARTC] Routing based on fwmark
  2003-03-04 18:27 [LARTC] Routing based on fwmark David Watson
@ 2003-03-04 18:58 ` Martin A. Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin A. Brown @ 2003-03-04 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc


David,

I have a hunch that it's a hexadecimal vs decimal issue.  Try converting
your fwmark numbers to hex and adding the fwmark rules again.

Ciao for now,

-Martin

 : 	I'm having trouble routing on high fwmarks, I want to use a lot of
 : different marks for 2 routes so that I can QoS based on the marks
 : ip rule looks like this:
 :
 : 0:      from all lookup local
 : 32751:  from all fwmark       31 lookup dslout
 : 32752:  from all fwmark       30 lookup dslout
 : 32753:  from all fwmark       29 lookup dslout
 : 32754:  from all fwmark       28 lookup dslout
 : 32755:  from all fwmark       27 lookup dslout
 : 32756:  from all fwmark       26 lookup dslout
 : 32757:  from all fwmark       25 lookup dslout
 : 32758:  from all fwmark       24 lookup dslout
 : 32759:  from all fwmark       21 lookup dslout
 : 32760:  from all fwmark       11 lookup dslout
 : 32761:  from all fwmark       10 lookup fibout
 : 32762:  from all fwmark        8 lookup dslout
 : 32763:  from all fwmark        7 lookup fibout
 : 32764:  from all fwmark        2 lookup dslout
 : 32765:  from all fwmark        1 lookup fibout
 : 32766:  from all lookup main
 : 32767:  from all lookup default

-- 
Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-04 18:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-04 18:27 [LARTC] Routing based on fwmark David Watson
2003-03-04 18:58 ` Martin A. Brown

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.