[LARTC] bug after new patches where applyed

[LARTC] bug after new patches where applyed

[Esteban Ribicic]

ive got some strange error: (after ip route patches where applyed)

root@debian:~# ip route get 172.0.0.2
Truncated message
root@debian:~# 
root@debian:~# strace ip route get 172.0.0.2
execve("/sbin/ip", ["ip", "route", "get", "172.0.0.2"], [/* 18 vars */])
= 0
uname({sys="Linux", node="debian", ...}) = 0
brk(0)                                  = 0x805dc24
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
-1, 0) = 0x4001300
0
open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY)    = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY)      = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_sizeF113, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 46113, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40014000
close(3)                                = 0
open("/lib/libresolv.so.2", O_RDONLY)   = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\300\'\0"...,
1024) = 1024
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_sizeV448, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 65252, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) 0x40020000
mprotect(0x4002d000, 12004, PROT_NONE)  = 0
old_mmap(0x4002d000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED,
3, 0xd000) = 0x4
002d000
old_mmap(0x4002e000, 7908, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1
, 0) = 0x4002e000
close(3)                                = 0
open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY)        = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\204\221"...,
1024) = 1024
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size\x1145456, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 1157888, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) 0x40030000
mprotect(0x40141000, 39680, PROT_NONE)  = 0
old_mmap(0x40141000, 24576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED,
3, 0x111000) = 
0x40141000
old_mmap(0x40147000, 15104, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -
1, 0) = 0x40147000
close(3)                                = 0
munmap(0x40014000, 46113)               = 0
socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, 0)         = 3
bind(3, {sin_family¯_NETLINK, {sa_family\x16,
sa_data="\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\236\224\0@"
}, 12) = 0
getsockname(3, {sin_family¯_NETLINK, {sa_family\x16,
sa_data="\307\314\f{\0\0\0\0\0\0\2
36\224\0@"}, [12]) = 0
time(NULL)                              = 1047045789
sendto(3, "\24\0\0\0\22\0\1\3\236\246h>\0\0\0\0\0,\1@", 20, 0,
{sin_family¯_NETLINK, {
sa_family\x16, sa_data="\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\24\0\0\0"}, 12) = 20
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sin_family¯_NETLINK, {sa_family\x16,
sa_data="\377\377\0\0\0\
0\0\0\0\0\264\0\0\0"},
msg_iov(1)=[{"\264\0\0\0\20\0\2\0\236\246h>\f{\0\0\0\0\4\3\1\0\0\
0I\0"..., 8192}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 740
brk(0)                                  = 0x805dc24
brk(0x805dc64)                          = 0x805dc64
brk(0x805e000)                          = 0x805e000
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sin_family¯_NETLINK, {sa_family\x16,
sa_data="\377\377\0\0\0\
0\0\0\0\0\24\0\0\0"},
msg_iov(1)=[{"\24\0\0\0\3\0\2\0\236\246h>\f{\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0I\
0\0"..., 8192}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 20
sendmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sin_family¯_NETLINK, {sa_family\x16,
sa_data="\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\
0\0\0\254\374\377\277"},
msg_iov(1)=[{"$\0\0\0\32\0\1\0\237\246h>\0\0\0\0\2 \0\0\0\0\0\0
\0\0\0"..., 36}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 36
recvmsg(3, {msg_name(12)={sin_family¯_NETLINK, {sa_family\x16,
sa_data="\377\377\0\0\0\
0\0\0\0\0\254\374\377\277"},
msg_iov(1)=[{"l\0\0\0\30\0\0\0\237\246h>\f{\0\0\2 \0\0\376\
0\0\1\0\2"..., 36}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=MSG_TRUNC}, 0) = 36
write(2, "Truncated message\n", 18Truncated message
)     = 18
_exit(2)                                = ?
root@debian:~#  




On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 19:58, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
> 	Hello,
> 
> On 5 Mar 2003, Esteban Ribicic wrote:
> 
> > julian,
> > the patch stuff is making me crazy (i have four servers running
> > iproute2)..
> >
> > i tryed to apply pathces on 2.4.20 in the following order so multipath,
> > nat, fwmark works:
> >
> > routes-2.4.20-9.diff
> > rtmasq-2.4.20-2.diff
> 
> 	Use rtmasq-2.4.20-routes9-2.diff instead, I just uploaded it.
> Apply it after routes-2.4.20-9.diff and let me know offline if it
> compiles and works.
> 
> Regards
> 
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
> 

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/