* [LARTC] IMQ/iptables question
@ 2003-03-14 14:13 David Watson
2003-03-14 21:39 ` Stef Coene
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Watson @ 2003-03-14 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello,
I am using IMQ on my firewall to manage downloads by two networks within
the firewall. I mark traffic in iptables, and jump to IMQ from postrouting.
This allows me to manage the traffic coming from the internet even though
it is leaving on 2 interfaces, however I think I've hit a limitation of
IMQ. If the firewall machine downloads from the internet link then
postrouting rules are not hit in iptables. I did try putting a rule in
input jumping to IMQ, but I wasn't particularly surprised when I didn't see
the traffic on imq0.
Is there a way to manage the input traffic to the firewall from the
internet alongside the two internal networks? I guess policing might be the
only option?
Thanks
_____________________________________________________________
David Watson, Network Manager, Team17 Software Ltd.
Phone: +44-1924-267776 Fax: +44-1924-267658
_____________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] IMQ/iptables question
2003-03-14 14:13 [LARTC] IMQ/iptables question David Watson
@ 2003-03-14 21:39 ` Stef Coene
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-03-14 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Friday 14 March 2003 15:13, David Watson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using IMQ on my firewall to manage downloads by two networks within
> the firewall. I mark traffic in iptables, and jump to IMQ from postrouting.
> This allows me to manage the traffic coming from the internet even though
> it is leaving on 2 interfaces, however I think I've hit a limitation of
> IMQ. If the firewall machine downloads from the internet link then
> postrouting rules are not hit in iptables. I did try putting a rule in
> input jumping to IMQ, but I wasn't particularly surprised when I didn't see
> the traffic on imq0.
So you tried putting packets from the input table in the imq device, but that
didn't worked? Strange.
> Is there a way to manage the input traffic to the firewall from the
> internet alongside the two internal networks? I guess policing might be the
> only option?
If you are able to put the traffic from the input iptable in the imq device,
you can.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-14 21:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-14 14:13 [LARTC] IMQ/iptables question David Watson
2003-03-14 21:39 ` Stef Coene
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.