All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LARTC] 2.2.x crash after patching (Was: Prioritising Ingress Traffic)
@ 2003-03-22 13:16 Gordan Bobic
  2003-03-23 13:49 ` [LARTC] 2.2.x crash after patching (Was: Prioritising Ingress Julian Anastasov
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gordan Bobic @ 2003-03-22 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

On Thursday 20 March 2003 23:36, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> > Provided the DS9 patch works for me, is it possible to somehow prioritize
> > what is dropped first and what is dropped last? Something like attaching
> > a prio/cbq to the ingress qdisc? For example, I want SSH/POP3/IMAP4
> > traffic to be dropped last, and FTP/SMTP traffic to be dropped first. Can
> > ingress support in DS9 do this, or is it limited to indiscriminately
> > dropping traffic?
>
> 	Except if someone has another idea, may be only dropping.
> I'm not sure there is IMQ for 2.2 :)

It doesn't appear to be there with the patches I applied... :-(

> May be you can look at
> Edge31-ca-u32 from the iproute2 examples, there are some ideas
> about using policers.

I have tried the ingress policing when the new patches, but according to my 
mrtg graphs, it still doesn't seem to work, even in it's simplest form. I 
THINK I saw it work with FTP, though (connection throttled), so I am not 
sure. It could be that it works initially, then stops later. I will 
investigate further...

> As for DS9, it tries to provide the same
> interface to all qos objects as in 2.4, so it is possible to do
> the same things as in 2.4, of course, there is one problem, nobody
> wants to support new features in 2.2 :)

Yeah, I know. I will upgrade at some point. ;-)

I seem to be having a problem with the newly applied patches, though. After 
6-8 hours, I get a kernel crash. Black screen od death, hex dumps, Aiee, 
killing interrupt handler, trying to kill idle task, etc. This happened 
twice, so it seems unlikely to be a coincidence, as the only patches applied 
were the DS9, rtree, HTB3 and routes. It used to be stable before. I am 
hoping that it is ingress related stuff that kills it, so I have turned that 
off (everything to do with ingress). We'll see if I get another crash now. If 
not, than it would appear that it is ingress policing that kills it after a 
while.

I will report back on this when I know more.

Regards.

Gordan
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-24 22:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-22 13:16 [LARTC] 2.2.x crash after patching (Was: Prioritising Ingress Traffic) Gordan Bobic
2003-03-23 13:49 ` [LARTC] 2.2.x crash after patching (Was: Prioritising Ingress Julian Anastasov
2003-03-23 17:51 ` [LARTC] 2.2.x crash after patching (Was: Prioritising Ingress Traffic) Gordan Bobic
2003-03-24 22:32 ` Gordan Bobic

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.