* [LARTC] How far can TC go?
@ 2003-03-29 5:07 Randolph Carter
2003-03-29 10:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2003-03-29 15:19 ` Randolph Carter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Randolph Carter @ 2003-03-29 5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
I have been working with HTB for around 10months; I've been testing it on
several enviroments and have had a good experience with. I'm Wondering if
if I could use HTB in a more agressive environment; and use some
feautures like layer-5-7 recogniction in order to bring a clever shaping.
Does somebody know if traffic control suplied by Linux could be compared
to the DTS supplied by CISCO; or if we can aim to do a job as dyband or
packeteer do?
Which are the limitations to our shaping system? Can we build a real
commercial solution?
Thanks, for the comments
There exist tasks which cannot be done by more than 10 men or fewer
than 100.
-- Steele's Law
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] How far can TC go?
2003-03-29 5:07 [LARTC] How far can TC go? Randolph Carter
@ 2003-03-29 10:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2003-03-29 15:19 ` Randolph Carter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2003-03-29 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Randolph Carter wrote:
>I have been working with HTB for around 10months; I've been testing it on
>several enviroments and have had a good experience with. I'm Wondering if
>if I could use HTB in a more agressive environment; and use some
>feautures like layer-5-7 recogniction in order to bring a clever shaping.
>
>Does somebody know if traffic control suplied by Linux could be compared
>to the DTS supplied by CISCO; or if we can aim to do a job as dyband or
>packeteer do?
>
>Which are the limitations to our shaping system? Can we build a real
>commercial solution?
>
>
Packeteer has various patents covering tcp rate control and everything else
they do, including the "idea" to look at upper layers to detect the type
of traffic.
I live in germany so i don't really care that much about their patents
(they had none
in europe last time i checked). last summer i started implementing tcp
rate control
as qdisc for linux. i haven't worked on it for a couple of month now,
but if anyone wishes
to participate i would be glad to dig out my source again. it is
basically working, the
remaining problems are mostly how to detect and handle interactive traffic.
Patrick
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] How far can TC go?
2003-03-29 5:07 [LARTC] How far can TC go? Randolph Carter
2003-03-29 10:08 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2003-03-29 15:19 ` Randolph Carter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Randolph Carter @ 2003-03-29 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Patrick, I would like to see your code, and see if when can work in such
solution; I'm not sure if the patents in the US cover my country, for I
live in Colombia.
Ask five economists and you'll get five different explanations (six if
one went to Harvard).
-- Edgar R. Fiedler
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-29 15:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-29 5:07 [LARTC] How far can TC go? Randolph Carter
2003-03-29 10:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2003-03-29 15:19 ` Randolph Carter
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.