[LARTC] Minimum System Requirements?

* [LARTC] Minimum System Requirements?
@ 2003-04-26  0:33 ambitious_llama
  2003-04-26  1:37 ` Greg Scott
  2003-04-26  7:49 ` Stef Coene
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ambitious_llama @ 2003-04-26  0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4173 bytes --]

I'm new here and to mailing lists in general so apologies in advance for
breaches in etiquette. I respond well to constructive criticism.

I'm curious what kind of hardware requirements are needed for effective
traffic shaping and control.

For example, could a P200 with 48MB RAM handle limiting, shaping,
NATing, and firewalling traffic from 5 - 6 clients on a 1.5Mbps/192kbps
cable line?

Thanks!

N

-----Original Message-----
From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl]
On Behalf Of lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl
Sent: April 25, 2003 4:54 PM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1138 - 12 msgs

Send LARTC mailing list submissions to
	lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl

You can reach the person managing the list at
	lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of LARTC digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. IMQ page (Dr Aldo Medina)
   2. Re: Still with HTB .. (rio@martin.mu)
   3. Re: IMQ page (hare ram)
   4. measure cpu load ? (Srikanth)
   5. Re: Tcng and wondershaper (Jacob Teplitsky)
   6. Re: IMQ page (Patrick McHardy)
   7. Re: measure cpu load ? (Martin Devera)
   8. BW Management: Shaping using IMQ or the *inner* interface? (George
Spiliotis)
   9. QoS upstream bandwidth sharing (D de Boer)
  10. Re: QoS upstream bandwidth sharing (Stef Coene)
  11. Re: Re: Still with HTB .. (Stef Coene)
  12. Re: Lots amounts of classes to solve the DAP problem (Stef Coene)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: Dr Aldo Medina <aldomedina@hotpop.com>
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Cc: kaber@trash.net
Date: 24 Apr 2003 23:49:01 -0500
Subject: [LARTC] IMQ page

The IMQ page (http://luxik.cdi.cz/~patrick/imq/) has some rather obvios
problems in the examples used. I wrote Patrick McHardy without getting
an answer (yet) so I tought this was a good place to ask. Does anybody
know how to contact him about this?

--__--__--

Message: 2
Reply-To: rio@martin.mu
From: "rio@martin.mu" <rio@martin.mu>
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 01:01:04 -0400
Subject: [LARTC] Re: Still with HTB ..

Stef,
I ve tried just as you described earlier=2E=2E
When using HTB qdisc, 10 hosts borrowing from the same parent results in
unfairness=2E When host 1 open about 10 tcp connections, as soon as host
2=

request for more bandwidth from parent, host 1 wont decrease the
speed=2E

But, when i only try to attach 2 hosts to the same parent, it succeed!
Host 2 get the requested bandwidth even if host 1 start 20
connections=2E

Could you analyze this for me ?

Regards,
Rio Martin=2E

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web=2Ecom/ =2E

--__--__--

Message: 3
Reply-To: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>
From: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>
To: "Dr Aldo Medina" <aldomedina@hotpop.com>, <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Cc: <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ page
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:46:28 +0530

Hi
yes the site has a examples problems

i have corrected when iam using
please understanding rule will make you an idea

hare
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dr Aldo Medina" <aldomedina@hotpop.com>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Cc: <kaber@trash.net>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 10:19 AM
Subject: [LARTC] IMQ page

> The IMQ page (http://luxik.cdi.cz/~patrick/imq/) has some rather 
> obvios problems in the examples used. I wrote Patrick McHardy without 
> getting an answer (yet) so I tought this was a good place to ask. Does

> anybody know how to contact him about this?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl 
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> 

--__--__--

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:48:56 +0530
From: Srikanth <srikanth_w@naturesoft.net>
Organization: Naturesoft
To: david_list@boreham.org
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: [LARTC] measure cpu load ?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 648 bytes --]

>> I would like to measure the CPU load for some queuing discipline, and

>> only queuing discipline. Is there any tool witch this can be done.

>I think you will need to do this indirectly.

>Perform an experiment like this:

>Setup a test machine. It runs nothing but traffic management.

>Push test traffic through the machine.

>Observe the machine's CPU load.

>You can now derive the relationship between traffic level, traffic mix,

>traffic type and CPU load, by repeating the experiment with different 
>input variables.

You can try with ttcp tool.

Srikanth.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/html, Size: 789 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread