From: "Griem, Hans T" <hans.t.griem@boeing.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] cbq vs htb?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 16:01:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105301464526654@msgid-missing> (raw)
Hello,
Does anyone know when one should use cbq versus (simpler more accurate) htb? Specifically does cbq have added functionality that may be of interest to certain applications?
from htb home> Both CBQ and HTB help you to control the use of the
outbound bandwidth on a given link. Both allow you to use one physical link to simulate several slower links and to send different kinds of traffic on different
simulated links. In both cases, you have to specify how to divide the physical link into simulated links and how to decide which simulated link to use for a given
packet to be sent. http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm
Thanks for any insight,
Torsten
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-15 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-15 16:01 Griem, Hans T [this message]
2003-05-15 17:00 ` [LARTC] cbq vs htb? Stef Coene
2003-05-15 17:17 ` Intercom - Roberto Ravetti
2003-05-15 18:13 ` Griem, Hans T
2003-05-15 18:26 ` Stef Coene
2003-05-22 21:11 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105301464526654@msgid-missing \
--to=hans.t.griem@boeing.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.