From: "Intercom - Roberto Ravetti" <rravetti@itc.com.ar>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] cbq vs htb?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:17:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105303007513533@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105301464526654@msgid-missing>
What I have told you, about the problem of ping delay with CBQ, is just with
RF Conection..
Bye
Roberto.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: "Griem, Hans T" <hans.t.griem@boeing.com>
Cc: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] cbq vs htb?
> On Thursday 15 May 2003 20:13, Griem, Hans T wrote:
> > Hello Cef or...,
> >
> > Thanks for your input. Yes I am trying to figure out where/what/when
these
> > obscure CBQ options add value (ie., to conclude whether I should
eliminate
> > cbq from my "toolchest"). So I wonder since cbq uses the physical link
per
> > your response is it better suited to bandwidth control for (rf)
> > applications with fluctuating link rates, etc?
> In contrary. The bandwidth option in cbq should match the real physical
link
> bandwidth. I don't know how this is done on rf networks.
> Comared this to htb. Htb uses a token bucket system to control the rate
of
> the data. This has nothing to do with the physical link. It just send
data
> at a certain controlled rate.
>
> I'm not a specialist in this. But I don't think I'm telling any lies :)
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
> "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
> http://www.docum.org/
> #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-15 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-15 16:01 [LARTC] cbq vs htb? Griem, Hans T
2003-05-15 17:00 ` Stef Coene
2003-05-15 17:17 ` Intercom - Roberto Ravetti [this message]
2003-05-15 18:13 ` Griem, Hans T
2003-05-15 18:26 ` Stef Coene
2003-05-22 21:11 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105303007513533@msgid-missing \
--to=rravetti@itc.com.ar \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.