* Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???
2003-06-24 22:25 [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>??? Trevor Warren
@ 2003-06-24 22:26 ` Trevor Warren
2003-06-25 7:25 ` Catalin BOIE
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Trevor Warren @ 2003-06-24 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
HELP....!!!!!!
Trevor
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 12:55, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > Hello,
> Hello!
>
> > I do understand that limits on u32 filters > 2000 have never been
> > encountered. Run this script which is base on htb and lemme know. You
> > will need 2.4.20 > and tc compiled for htb.
>
> It gives me a lot of "RTNETLINK answers: File exists".
> This doesn't seems to be a limit.
>
> > Can you please send me your config and lemme compare the same against
> > mine.
> I have main in a database. I cannot give it to you, but trust me that are
> 50000 filters.
>
> Try to use hashes to reduce the kernel pressure.
>
> >
> > Trevor
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:49, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Can some one please confirm which would be the best place to clarify
> > > > these U32 issues and 2048 U32 filter limitations as i had posted in my
> > > > previous mail.
> > > >
> > > > Trevor
> > >
> > > We have 50000 filters and still working.
> > > I don't think there is a limit.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
> > > > /~\ __ twarren@redhat.com __ /~\
> > > > | \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
> > > > |_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
> > > > \___________________________________/
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Catalin(ux) BOIE
> > > catab@deuroconsult.ro
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> > --
> > ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
> > /~\ __ twarren@redhat.com __ /~\
> > | \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
> > |_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
> > \___________________________________/
> >
>
> ---
> Catalin(ux) BOIE
catab@deuroconsult.ro
--
( >- LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
/~\ __ twarren@redhat.com __ /~\
| \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
|_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
\___________________________________/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???
2003-06-24 22:25 [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>??? Trevor Warren
2003-06-24 22:26 ` Trevor Warren
@ 2003-06-25 7:25 ` Catalin BOIE
2003-06-25 11:17 ` Giannis Stoilis
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Catalin BOIE @ 2003-06-25 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
> Hello,
Hello!
> I do understand that limits on u32 filters > 2000 have never been
> encountered. Run this script which is base on htb and lemme know. You
> will need 2.4.20 > and tc compiled for htb.
It gives me a lot of "RTNETLINK answers: File exists".
This doesn't seems to be a limit.
> Can you please send me your config and lemme compare the same against
> mine.
I have main in a database. I cannot give it to you, but trust me that are
50000 filters.
Try to use hashes to reduce the kernel pressure.
>
> Trevor
>
>
> On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:49, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Trevor Warren wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Can some one please confirm which would be the best place to clarify
> > > these U32 issues and 2048 U32 filter limitations as i had posted in my
> > > previous mail.
> > >
> > > Trevor
> >
> > We have 50000 filters and still working.
> > I don't think there is a limit.
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
> > > /~\ __ twarren@redhat.com __ /~\
> > > | \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
> > > |_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
> > > \___________________________________/
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> > >
> >
> > ---
> > Catalin(ux) BOIE
> > catab@deuroconsult.ro
> > _______________________________________________
> > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> --
> ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
> /~\ __ twarren@redhat.com __ /~\
> | \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
> |_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
> \___________________________________/
>
---
Catalin(ux) BOIE
catab@deuroconsult.ro
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???
2003-06-24 22:25 [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>??? Trevor Warren
2003-06-24 22:26 ` Trevor Warren
2003-06-25 7:25 ` Catalin BOIE
@ 2003-06-25 11:17 ` Giannis Stoilis
2003-06-25 20:18 ` Michael Ulitskiy
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Giannis Stoilis @ 2003-06-25 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor Warren" <trevorwarren@softhome.net>
To: "Catalin BOIE" <util@deuroconsult.ro>
Cc: "lartc" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>; "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org>
Sent: Τετάρτη, 25 Ιουνίου 2003 1:14 πμ
Subject: Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???
> HELP....!!!!!!
OK, OK!
Send me your script again and I will try it...
- Giannis
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???
2003-06-24 22:25 [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>??? Trevor Warren
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-25 11:17 ` Giannis Stoilis
@ 2003-06-25 20:18 ` Michael Ulitskiy
2003-06-26 7:34 ` Trevor Warren
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ulitskiy @ 2003-06-25 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3348 bytes --]
Hi,
This is the script I'm using to create tc configuration to shape
currently about 8000 ips separately so that each ip has guaranteed
bandwith and cannot exceed it. The script can be used to
shape up to class B. The configuration is using double hashing
for filtering rules. I haven't used it in production yet, but it shows
pretty good result on a testbed.
To test it further I've created configuration to shape range
192.168.1.0-192.168.254.0 (almost class B), i.e.about 65000 classes
and about 65000 filters. It takes very long time to apply on my
rather slow (P166mmx) test machine, but it doesn't throw a word
of complaint.
Creating configuration:
root@test:~/perl/qos# time ./qos.conf
real 0m42.733s
user 0m40.950s
sys 0m0.490s
It creates file rc.qos. Applying configuration:
root@test:~/perl/qos# time . ./rc.qos
real 125m48.033s
user 28m40.660s
sys 95m59.420s
root@radtest:~/perl/qos# tc qdisc ls | wc -l
64520
root@radtest:~/perl/qos# tc filter ls dev eth0 parent 13:0 | wc -l
129042
(2 output lines for a filter).
So the answer to your question most likely is no. There's no limit.
Hint: I've experienced something like that when I tried to use precompiled
binary (actually I compiled it myself but on different machine).
The errors were gone after I recompiled tc from the same sources
on the machine where it's being used. Could be some libraries
incompatibilities or changes made to some header files.
So look at the script if you're interested.
Michael
p.s. I'm not sure that larts list manager will allow attachment through.
If it doesn't and you want the script - email me.
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 06:13 pm, Trevor Warren wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If this isn't a limit of U32 filters then whats wrong with the way i
> have set things up???. The issue has to be somewhere right.
>
> Also, i do appreciate you not wanting to give me your config. But at
> least give me a couple of lines of your U32 filter usage such that i can
> make 5000> filters using it and test. Only passing your u32 filter
> config.....if its your equivalent to IP then its fine with me...:)
>
> I will have the test script mailed across to all. I am in DESPERATE
> need for help on this part......:(
>
> Trevor
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 12:55, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > Hello!
> >
> > > I do understand that limits on u32 filters > 2000 have never been
> > > encountered. Run this script which is base on htb and lemme know. You
> > > will need 2.4.20 > and tc compiled for htb.
> >
> > It gives me a lot of "RTNETLINK answers: File exists".
> > This doesn't seems to be a limit.
> >
> > > Can you please send me your config and lemme compare the same against
> > > mine.
> > I have main in a database. I cannot give it to you, but trust me that are
> > 50000 filters.
> >
> > Try to use hashes to reduce the kernel pressure.
> >
> > >
> > > Trevor
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:49, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Can some one please confirm which would be the best place to clarify
> > > > > these U32 issues and 2048 U32 filter limitations as i had posted in my
> > > > > previous mail.
> > > > >
> > > > > Trevor
> > > >
> > > > We have 50000 filters and still working.
> > > > I don't think there is a limit.
[-- Attachment #2: qos.conf --]
[-- Type: application/x-perl, Size: 3568 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???
2003-06-24 22:25 [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>??? Trevor Warren
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-25 20:18 ` Michael Ulitskiy
@ 2003-06-26 7:34 ` Trevor Warren
2003-06-26 13:40 ` Michael Ulitskiy
2003-06-29 17:44 ` Trevor Warren
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Trevor Warren @ 2003-06-26 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Thanks a ton for the same Michael. I am downloading tc from source and
will have the same compiled. Am actually using tc as distributed by
Martin of HTB fame.
So you saying...probably the tc binary distributed by it could be and
issue???. Anyway, i will have the same tried out and let you know.
Trevor
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 01:48, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the script I'm using to create tc configuration to shape
> currently about 8000 ips separately so that each ip has guaranteed
> bandwith and cannot exceed it. The script can be used to
> shape up to class B. The configuration is using double hashing
> for filtering rules. I haven't used it in production yet, but it shows
> pretty good result on a testbed.
> To test it further I've created configuration to shape range
> 192.168.1.0-192.168.254.0 (almost class B), i.e.about 65000 classes
> and about 65000 filters. It takes very long time to apply on my
> rather slow (P166mmx) test machine, but it doesn't throw a word
> of complaint.
>
> Creating configuration:
> root@test:~/perl/qos# time ./qos.conf
>
> real 0m42.733s
> user 0m40.950s
> sys 0m0.490s
>
> It creates file rc.qos. Applying configuration:
> root@test:~/perl/qos# time . ./rc.qos
>
> real 125m48.033s
> user 28m40.660s
> sys 95m59.420s
>
> root@radtest:~/perl/qos# tc qdisc ls | wc -l
> 64520
> root@radtest:~/perl/qos# tc filter ls dev eth0 parent 13:0 | wc -l
> 129042
> (2 output lines for a filter).
>
> So the answer to your question most likely is no. There's no limit.
> Hint: I've experienced something like that when I tried to use precompiled
> binary (actually I compiled it myself but on different machine).
> The errors were gone after I recompiled tc from the same sources
> on the machine where it's being used. Could be some libraries
> incompatibilities or changes made to some header files.
> So look at the script if you're interested.
>
> Michael
>
> p.s. I'm not sure that larts list manager will allow attachment through.
> If it doesn't and you want the script - email me.
>
>
> On Tuesday 24 June 2003 06:13 pm, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > If this isn't a limit of U32 filters then whats wrong with the way i
> > have set things up???. The issue has to be somewhere right.
> >
> > Also, i do appreciate you not wanting to give me your config. But at
> > least give me a couple of lines of your U32 filter usage such that i can
> > make 5000> filters using it and test. Only passing your u32 filter
> > config.....if its your equivalent to IP then its fine with me...:)
> >
> > I will have the test script mailed across to all. I am in DESPERATE
> > need for help on this part......:(
> >
> > Trevor
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 12:55, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > > I do understand that limits on u32 filters > 2000 have never been
> > > > encountered. Run this script which is base on htb and lemme know. You
> > > > will need 2.4.20 > and tc compiled for htb.
> > >
> > > It gives me a lot of "RTNETLINK answers: File exists".
> > > This doesn't seems to be a limit.
> > >
> > > > Can you please send me your config and lemme compare the same against
> > > > mine.
> > > I have main in a database. I cannot give it to you, but trust me that are
> > > 50000 filters.
> > >
> > > Try to use hashes to reduce the kernel pressure.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Trevor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:49, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can some one please confirm which would be the best place to clarify
> > > > > > these U32 issues and 2048 U32 filter limitations as i had posted in my
> > > > > > previous mail.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Trevor
> > > > >
> > > > > We have 50000 filters and still working.
> > > > > I don't think there is a limit.
--
( >- LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
/~\ __ twarren@redhat.com __ /~\
| \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
|_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
\___________________________________/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???
2003-06-24 22:25 [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>??? Trevor Warren
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-26 7:34 ` Trevor Warren
@ 2003-06-26 13:40 ` Michael Ulitskiy
2003-06-29 17:44 ` Trevor Warren
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ulitskiy @ 2003-06-26 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
No, this is of cause incorrect. Just forgot to change it.
Should be 192.168.0.0/16
Michael
On Thursday 26 June 2003 03:27 am, you wrote:
> /root/bin/tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 13:0 prio 5 u32 ht 800:: \
> match ip dst 66.114.0.0/16 hashkey mask 0x0000ff00 at 16 link 2:
> /root/bin/tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 13:0 prio 5 u32 ht 800:: \
> match ip dst 66.114.0.0/16 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 16 link 3:
> #--- end of filters ---
>
> Is it correct ?( the hashkey seems to me it matches the 168 and X from 192.168.X.Y)
>
> Alex
> Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the script I'm using to create tc configuration to shape
> > currently about 8000 ips separately so that each ip has guaranteed
> > bandwith and cannot exceed it. The script can be used to
> > shape up to class B. The configuration is using double hashing
> > for filtering rules. I haven't used it in production yet, but it shows
> > pretty good result on a testbed.
> > To test it further I've created configuration to shape range
> > 192.168.1.0-192.168.254.0 (almost class B), i.e.about 65000 classes
> > and about 65000 filters. It takes very long time to apply on my
> > rather slow (P166mmx) test machine, but it doesn't throw a word
> > of complaint.
> >
> > Creating configuration:
> > root@test:~/perl/qos# time ./qos.conf
> >
> > real 0m42.733s
> > user 0m40.950s
> > sys 0m0.490s
> >
> > It creates file rc.qos. Applying configuration:
> > root@test:~/perl/qos# time . ./rc.qos
> >
> > real 125m48.033s
> > user 28m40.660s
> > sys 95m59.420s
> >
> > root@radtest:~/perl/qos# tc qdisc ls | wc -l
> > 64520
> > root@radtest:~/perl/qos# tc filter ls dev eth0 parent 13:0 | wc -l
> > 129042
> > (2 output lines for a filter).
> >
> > So the answer to your question most likely is no. There's no limit.
> > Hint: I've experienced something like that when I tried to use precompiled
> > binary (actually I compiled it myself but on different machine).
> > The errors were gone after I recompiled tc from the same sources
> > on the machine where it's being used. Could be some libraries
> > incompatibilities or changes made to some header files.
> > So look at the script if you're interested.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > p.s. I'm not sure that larts list manager will allow attachment through.
> > If it doesn't and you want the script - email me.
> >
> > On Tuesday 24 June 2003 06:13 pm, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > If this isn't a limit of U32 filters then whats wrong with the way i
> > > have set things up???. The issue has to be somewhere right.
> > >
> > > Also, i do appreciate you not wanting to give me your config. But at
> > > least give me a couple of lines of your U32 filter usage such that i can
> > > make 5000> filters using it and test. Only passing your u32 filter
> > > config.....if its your equivalent to IP then its fine with me...:)
> > >
> > > I will have the test script mailed across to all. I am in DESPERATE
> > > need for help on this part......:(
> > >
> > > Trevor
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 12:55, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > > I do understand that limits on u32 filters > 2000 have never been
> > > > > encountered. Run this script which is base on htb and lemme know. You
> > > > > will need 2.4.20 > and tc compiled for htb.
> > > >
> > > > It gives me a lot of "RTNETLINK answers: File exists".
> > > > This doesn't seems to be a limit.
> > > >
> > > > > Can you please send me your config and lemme compare the same against
> > > > > mine.
> > > > I have main in a database. I cannot give it to you, but trust me that are
> > > > 50000 filters.
> > > >
> > > > Try to use hashes to reduce the kernel pressure.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Trevor
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:49, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can some one please confirm which would be the best place to clarify
> > > > > > > these U32 issues and 2048 U32 filter limitations as i had posted in my
> > > > > > > previous mail.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Trevor
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We have 50000 filters and still working.
> > > > > > I don't think there is a limit.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Name: qos.conf
> > qos.conf Type: Perl Program (application/x-perl)
> > Encoding: 7bit
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???
2003-06-24 22:25 [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>??? Trevor Warren
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-06-26 13:40 ` Michael Ulitskiy
@ 2003-06-29 17:44 ` Trevor Warren
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Trevor Warren @ 2003-06-29 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello Michael,
Lemme again thank you for your helpful insight. You have mentioned that
use of tc and iproute from source hasn't given you any issues.
I am gonna following the same instead of using RH packaged tools. Will
let you know the outcome.
Stef....you have any idea about this issue with RH tools???
Trevor
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 21:01, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
> On Thursday 26 June 2003 03:22 am, you wrote:
> > Thanks a ton for the same Michael. I am downloading tc from source and
> > will have the same compiled. Am actually using tc as distributed by
> > Martin of HTB fame.
> >
> > So you saying...probably the tc binary distributed by it could be and
> > issue???. Anyway, i will have the same tried out and let you know.
>
> Honestly, I don't know. I'm using iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try.tar.gz and
> htb3.6-020525.tgz patch and it seems to work fine.
> It's already in production and looks good so far.
>
> Michael
>
> > Trevor
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 01:48, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is the script I'm using to create tc configuration to shape
> > > currently about 8000 ips separately so that each ip has guaranteed
> > > bandwith and cannot exceed it. The script can be used to
> > > shape up to class B. The configuration is using double hashing
> > > for filtering rules. I haven't used it in production yet, but it shows
> > > pretty good result on a testbed.
> > > To test it further I've created configuration to shape range
> > > 192.168.1.0-192.168.254.0 (almost class B), i.e.about 65000 classes
> > > and about 65000 filters. It takes very long time to apply on my
> > > rather slow (P166mmx) test machine, but it doesn't throw a word
> > > of complaint.
> > >
> > > Creating configuration:
> > > root@test:~/perl/qos# time ./qos.conf
> > >
> > > real 0m42.733s
> > > user 0m40.950s
> > > sys 0m0.490s
> > >
> > > It creates file rc.qos. Applying configuration:
> > > root@test:~/perl/qos# time . ./rc.qos
> > >
> > > real 125m48.033s
> > > user 28m40.660s
> > > sys 95m59.420s
> > >
> > > root@radtest:~/perl/qos# tc qdisc ls | wc -l
> > > 64520
> > > root@radtest:~/perl/qos# tc filter ls dev eth0 parent 13:0 | wc -l
> > > 129042
> > > (2 output lines for a filter).
> > >
> > > So the answer to your question most likely is no. There's no limit.
> > > Hint: I've experienced something like that when I tried to use precompiled
> > > binary (actually I compiled it myself but on different machine).
> > > The errors were gone after I recompiled tc from the same sources
> > > on the machine where it's being used. Could be some libraries
> > > incompatibilities or changes made to some header files.
> > > So look at the script if you're interested.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > p.s. I'm not sure that larts list manager will allow attachment through.
> > > If it doesn't and you want the script - email me.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 24 June 2003 06:13 pm, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > If this isn't a limit of U32 filters then whats wrong with the way i
> > > > have set things up???. The issue has to be somewhere right.
> > > >
> > > > Also, i do appreciate you not wanting to give me your config. But at
> > > > least give me a couple of lines of your U32 filter usage such that i can
> > > > make 5000> filters using it and test. Only passing your u32 filter
> > > > config.....if its your equivalent to IP then its fine with me...:)
> > > >
> > > > I will have the test script mailed across to all. I am in DESPERATE
> > > > need for help on this part......:(
> > > >
> > > > Trevor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 12:55, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > Hello!
> > > > >
> > > > > > I do understand that limits on u32 filters > 2000 have never been
> > > > > > encountered. Run this script which is base on htb and lemme know. You
> > > > > > will need 2.4.20 > and tc compiled for htb.
> > > > >
> > > > > It gives me a lot of "RTNETLINK answers: File exists".
> > > > > This doesn't seems to be a limit.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Can you please send me your config and lemme compare the same against
> > > > > > mine.
> > > > > I have main in a database. I cannot give it to you, but trust me that are
> > > > > 50000 filters.
> > > > >
> > > > > Try to use hashes to reduce the kernel pressure.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Trevor
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:49, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can some one please confirm which would be the best place to clarify
> > > > > > > > these U32 issues and 2048 U32 filter limitations as i had posted in my
> > > > > > > > previous mail.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Trevor
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We have 50000 filters and still working.
> > > > > > > I don't think there is a limit.
> > --
> > ( >- LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
> > /~\ __ twarren@redhat.com __ /~\
> > | \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
> > |_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
> > \___________________________________/
> >
> >
--
( >- LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )
/~\ __ twarren@redhat.com __ /~\
| \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ |
|_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_|
\___________________________________/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread