[LARTC] the difference between kernel ipsec with frees/wan

[LARTC] the difference between kernel ipsec with frees/wan

[Yuan ChunYang]

 hi,
 In kenel 2.5.47, ipsec is implemented .
 Can some body tell me the difference between kernel ipsec with
frees/wan?

                                                      yuan


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] the difference between kernel ipsec with frees/wan

[Jose Luis Domingo Lopez]

On Monday, 30 June 2003, at 09:10:32 +0800,
Yuan ChunYang wrote:

>  In kenel 2.5.47, ipsec is implemented .
>  Can some body tell me the difference between kernel ipsec with
> frees/wan?
> 
Two implementations of the same protocol suite, IPsec. FreeS/WAN works
(at least) for 2.4.x and older kernels, native 2.5.x implementations
speaks for itself :-). The seem to interoperate well, though.

It seems FreeS/WAN was never accepted by Linus for some reason (sure,
there must be a reason :), and for the upcoming 2.6.x kernel some people
did a brand-new implementation, included in the standard kernel sources.
Native kernel 2.5.x IPsec implementation uses user space tools from the
KAME project (*BSD), whereas FreeS/WAN uses its own.

You can learn more about IPsec in 2.5.x at lartc.org.

Hope it helps.

-- 
Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
Linux Registered User #189436     Debian Linux Sid (Linux 2.5.73)
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] the difference between kernel ipsec with frees/wan

[Yuan ChunYang]

<<< No Message Collected >>>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/